Literature DB >> 19248545

Pseudoaccommodative cornea treatment using the NIDEK EC-5000 CXIII excimer laser in myopic and hyperopic presbyopes.

Edward Uy1, Rory Go.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the refractive outcomes and spherical aberration of multifocal LASIK to create a distant-dominant center and near-dominant periphery in hyperopic, myopic, and emmetropic presbyopia.
METHODS: One hundred ninety-five eyes with myopic presbyopia and 119 eyes with hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia that underwent LASIK or epithelial LASIK (epi-LASIK) were assessed out to 3 months postoperatively. All eyes underwent the pseudoaccommodative cornea (PAC) treatment using aspheric ablation profiles and wavefront correction with the NIDEK CXIII excimer laser. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.80+/-2.10 diopters (D) for myopic presbyopia and +1.00+/-0.92 D for hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.40+/-0.77 D for myopic presbyopia and +0.15+/-0.62 D for hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia. Functional vision, defined as 20/30 or better distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) combined with J3 or better near UCVA, was achieved in 162 (83%) eyes with myopic presbyopia and 103 (87%) eyes with hyperopic or emmetropic presbyopia. An induction of 0.312 microm of spherical aberration was noted at 6 mm for myopic presbyopia treatments and 0.016 microm for hyperopic presbyopia treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: The distance-dominant center used for PAC treatments is effective in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic presbyopia. The induced spherical aberration allows for depth of focus in patients with presbyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19248545     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090115-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Conductive keratoplasty for the treatment of presbyopia: comparative study between post- and non-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Miyuki Watabe; Mitsutoshi Ito; Tadahiko Tsuru
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-16

2.  Reversal of a presbyopic LASIK treatment.

Authors:  Robert Edward Ang; Rosalie Mae M Reyes; Maria Luisa P Solis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-12

3.  Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis multifocal ablation profile using a mini-monovision approach for presbyopic patients with hyperopia.

Authors:  Iraklis Vastardis; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspühler; Jörg Müller; Zeljka Cvejic; Bojan Pajic
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-14

Review 4.  Corneal Refractive Procedures for the Treatment of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Kareem Moussa; Naz Jehangir; Tova Mannis; Wai L Wong; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 5.  Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Zare Mehrjerdi; Masomeh Mohebbi; Mehdi Zandian
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  Functional Outcomes and Reading Speeds following PRESBYOND LBV Using Nonlinear Aspheric Ablation Profiles Combined with Micro-Monovision.

Authors:  Sheetal Brar; Smith Snehal Sute; Sheetal N Bagare; Sri Ganesh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 7.  Presbyopic correction on the cornea.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-13

Review 8.  Current management of presbyopia.

Authors:  Pandelis A Papadopoulos; Alexandros P Papadopoulos
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.