Literature DB >> 19247992

The intraruminal papillation gradient in wild ruminants of different feeding types: Implications for rumen physiology.

Marcus Clauss1, Reinhold R Hofmann, Jörns Fickel, W Jürgen Streich, Jürgen Hummel.   

Abstract

Browsing and grazing ruminants are thought to differ in the degree their rumen contents are stratified-which may be due to different characteristics of their respective forages, to particular adaptations of the animals, or both. However, this stratification is difficult to measure in live animals. The papillation of the rumen has been suggested as an anatomical proxy for stratification-with even papillation indicating homogenous contents, and uneven papillation (with few and small dorsal and ventral papillae, and prominent papillae in the atrium ruminis) stratified contents. Using the surface enlargement factor (SEF, indicating how basal mucosa surface is increased by papillae) of over 55 ruminant species, we demonstrate that differences between the SEF(dorsal) or SEF(ventral) and the SEF(atrium) are significantly related to the percentage of grass in the natural diet. The more a species is adapted to grass, the more distinct this difference, with extreme grazers having unpapillated dorsal and ventral mucosa. The relative SEF(dorsal) as anatomical proxy for stratification, and the difference in particle and fluid retention in the rumen as physiological proxy for stratification, are highly correlated in species (n = 9) for which both kind of data are available. The results support the concept that the stratification of rumen contents varies among ruminants, with more homogenous contents in the more browsing and more stratified contents in the more grazing species. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247992     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  7 in total

1.  Impact of weaning age on rumen development in artificially reared lambs1.

Authors:  Omar Cristobal Carballo; Muhammad Ajmal Khan; Frederik Willem Knol; Sarah Jeanne Lewis; David Robert Stevens; Richard Anthony Laven; Susan Anne McCoard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  UT-B Urea Transporter Localization in the Bovine Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  J Coyle; S McDaid; C Walpole; Gavin S Stewart
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Snout shape in extant ruminants.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Norman MacLeod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Nutritional Balancing Act of a Large Herbivore: An Experiment with Captive Moose (Alces alces L).

Authors:  Annika M Felton; Adam Felton; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson; Sophie J Krizsan; Per-Ola Hedwall; Caroline Stolter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative Microbiome Analysis Reveals the Ecological Relationships Between Rumen Methanogens, Acetogens, and Their Hosts.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Xiaoxu Wang; Antton Alberdi; Jiabo Deng; Zhenyu Zhong; Huazhe Si; Chengli Zheng; Hanlin Zhou; Jianming Wang; Yifeng Yang; André-Denis G Wright; Shengyong Mao; Zhigang Zhang; Leluo Guan; Guangyu Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Bacterial communities in the solid, liquid, dorsal, and ventral epithelium fractions of yak (Bos grunniens) rumen.

Authors:  Qingmiao Ren; Huazhe Si; Xiaoting Yan; Chang Liu; Luming Ding; Ruijun Long; Zhipeng Li; Qiang Qiu
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  A retrospective study on transabdominal ultrasound measurements of the rumen wall thickness to evaluate chronic rumen acidosis in beef cattle.

Authors:  Enrico Fiore; Vanessa Faillace; Massimo Morgante; Leonardo Armato; Matteo Gianesella
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.741

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.