Literature DB >> 19247240

Once- versus twice-weekly changing of central venous catheter occlusive dressing in intensive chemotherapy patients: results of a randomized multicenter study.

Samuel Vokurka1, Eva Bystricka, Maria Visokaiova, Jana Scudlova.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changing a central venous catheter occlusive dressing on a twice-weekly basis is usually recommended in hemato-oncological patients. A longer interval is believed to give rise to infections. However, frequent dressing changes might cause local cutaneous damage. MATERIAL/
METHODS: Local cutaneous damage and infections were compared in patients with once-weekly versus twice-weekly changes of central venous catheters occlusive dressings. This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with acute myeloid leukemia being treated with intensive chemotherapy were enrolled (twice-weekly group: n=42, once-weekly group: n=39). They had a non-tunneled polyurethane central venous catheter inserted into the vena subclavia and the insertion site was covered by a polyurethane semi-permeable occlusive dressing. No differences were observed between the groups with respect to local cutaneous damage, fevers, or positive catheter blood cultures. There were more insertion-site inflammations in the twice-weekly group (55% vs. 25%, p=0.008). In the once-weekly group it was necessary to change the occlusive dressing sooner in 42% of the cases, mostly due to a soiled dressing and local bleeding, and the real mean interval of changes was 5.4 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging the frequency of occlusive dressing change to a once-weekly interval was limited by an increasing number of unplanned dressing changes. The prolonged interval of dressing changes, with a real mean interval of 5.4 days, did not lead to an increased number of local cutaneous complications or central venous catheter blood culture positivity and even contributed to reduced insertion-site inflammation occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


  5 in total

1.  Complications of intravascular catheters in ICU: definitions, incidence and severity. A randomized controlled trial comparing usual transparent dressings versus new-generation dressings (the ADVANCED study).

Authors:  Silvia Calviño Günther; Carole Schwebel; Rebecca Hamidfar-Roy; Agnès Bonadona; Maxime Lugosi; Claire Ara-Somohano; Clémence Minet; Leïla Potton; Jean-Charles Cartier; Aurelien Vésin; Magalie Chautemps; Lenka Styfalova; Stephane Ruckly; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Central venous catheter dressing durability: an evaluation.

Authors:  Annette Richardson; Andrew Melling; Chris Straughan; Lisa Simms; Catherine Coulter; Yvonne Elliot; Sheeja Reji; Natalie Wilson; Rachael Byrne; Catherine Desmond; Stephen E Wright
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2015-07-23

3.  Dressings for the central venous catheter to prevent infection in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renata Cristina de Campos Pereira Silveira; Paula Elaine Diniz Dos Reis; Elaine Barros Ferreira; Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Braga; Cristina Maria Galvão; Alexander Michael Clark
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.

Authors:  Mari Takashima; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Amanda Ullman; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Frequency of dressing changes for central venous access devices on catheter-related infections.

Authors:  Nicole C Gavin; Joan Webster; Raymond J Chan; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.