OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of two new diagnostic methods to detect and accurately identify yeast associated with chronic wound infections. METHOD: Fungal tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (fTEFAP), a universal fungal identification method, bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP), a universal bacterial identification method, and a new quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) wound pathogen panel were used to evaluate three chronic wounds suspected to contain yeast. RESULTS: Forty wound samples were analysed in addition to the three samples suspected of containing yeast. The qPCR panel, which targets Candida albicans, detected this yeast in two of the three wound samples. In contrast, fTEFAP detected yeast in each of the three samples: two showed Candida albicans and the third Candida parapsilosis. fTEFAP also identified a lower level of Candida tropicalis in one of the wounds that was positive for Candida albicans. The qPCR wound panel results were returned within two hours, while the fTEFAP results were returned within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Two new molecular methods have been developed to aid wound pathogen diagnostics. The quantitative PCR wound panel is rapid but is limited to major wound-associated bacteria and yeasts. The universal fTEFAP and bTEFAP methods take 24 hours to return results but are able to detect the relative contribution of any bacteria of yeast in a chronic wound diagnostic sample. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: Southwest Regional Wound Care Center is a clinical wound-care provider seeking to improve the ability of wound care practitioners to help patients. The Research and Testing Laboratory develops molecular methods including fTEFAP, bTEFAP and the quantitative PCR wound panel.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of two new diagnostic methods to detect and accurately identify yeast associated with chronic wound infections. METHOD: Fungal tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (fTEFAP), a universal fungal identification method, bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP), a universal bacterial identification method, and a new quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) wound pathogen panel were used to evaluate three chronic wounds suspected to contain yeast. RESULTS: Forty wound samples were analysed in addition to the three samples suspected of containing yeast. The qPCR panel, which targets Candida albicans, detected this yeast in two of the three wound samples. In contrast, fTEFAP detected yeast in each of the three samples: two showed Candida albicans and the third Candida parapsilosis. fTEFAP also identified a lower level of Candida tropicalis in one of the wounds that was positive for Candida albicans. The qPCR wound panel results were returned within two hours, while the fTEFAP results were returned within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Two new molecular methods have been developed to aid wound pathogen diagnostics. The quantitative PCR wound panel is rapid but is limited to major wound-associated bacteria and yeasts. The universal fTEFAP and bTEFAP methods take 24 hours to return results but are able to detect the relative contribution of any bacteria of yeast in a chronic wound diagnostic sample. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: Southwest Regional Wound Care Center is a clinical wound-care provider seeking to improve the ability of wound care practitioners to help patients. The Research and Testing Laboratory develops molecular methods including fTEFAP, bTEFAP and the quantitative PCR wound panel.
Authors: Marco Veneranda; Nagore Prieto-Taboada; Silvia Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo; Maite Maguregui; Hector Morillas; Iker Marcaida; Kepa Castro; Juan Manuel Madariaga; Massimo Osanna Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Matthew W Nonnenmann; Gloria Coronado; Beti Thompson; William C Griffith; John Delton Hanson; Stephen Vesper; Elaine M Faustman Journal: J Environ Monit Date: 2012-07-05
Authors: Drake M Smith; David E Snow; Eric Rees; Ann M Zischkau; J Delton Hanson; Randall D Wolcott; Yan Sun; Jennifer White; Shashi Kumar; Scot E Dowd Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Christopher D Sibley; Margot E Grinwis; Tyler R Field; Christina S Eshaghurshan; Monica M Faria; Scot E Dowd; Michael D Parkins; Harvey R Rabin; Michael G Surette Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.240