Literature DB >> 19245974

Impact of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of ventricular function and clinical management in a large prospective cohort.

Mustafa Kurt1, Kamran A Shaikh, Leif Peterson, Karla M Kurrelmeyer, Gopi Shah, Sherif F Nagueh, Robert Fromm, Miguel A Quinones, William A Zoghbi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of echocardiographic contrast utilization on patient diagnosis and management.
BACKGROUND: Contrast echocardiography (CE) has improved visualization of endocardial borders. However, its impact on patient management has not been evaluated previously.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 632 consecutive patients with technically difficult echocardiographic studies who received intravenous contrast (Definity, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Billerica, Massachusetts). Quality of studies, number of left ventricular (LV) segments visualized, estimated ejection fraction, presence of apical thrombus, and management decisions were compared before and after contrast.
RESULTS: After CE, the percent of uninterpretable studies decreased from 11.7% to 0.3% and technically difficult studies decreased from 86.7% to 9.8% (p < 0.0001). Before contrast, 11.6 +/- 3.3 of 17 LV segments were seen, which improved after CE to 16.8 +/- 1.1 (p < 0.0001). An LV thrombus was suspected in 35 patients and was definite in 3 patients before CE. After contrast, only 1 patient had a suspected thrombus, and 5 additional patients with thrombus were identified (p < 0.0001). A significant impact of CE on management was observed: additional diagnostic procedures were avoided in 32.8% of patients and drug management was altered in 10.4%, with a total impact (procedures avoided, change in drugs, or both) observed in 35.6% of patients. The impact of contrast increased with worsening quality of nonenhanced study, the highest being in intensive care units. A cost-benefit analysis showed a significant savings using contrast ($122/patient).
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of CE in technically difficult cases improves endocardial visualization and impacts cardiac diagnosis, resource utilization, and patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19245974     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  51 in total

1.  Safety of echocardiographic contrast in hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Omar Wever-Pinzon; Valentin Suma; Ameeta Ahuja; Jorge Romero; Nishtha Sareen; Sonia A Henry; Maria De Benedetti Zunino; Farhan F Chaudhry; Ramya S Suryadevara; Mark V Sherrid; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography: what have we learned from the new guidelines?

Authors:  Kevin Wei
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  The incremental impact of cardiac MRI on clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Adil Rajwani; Michael J Stewart; James D Richardson; Nicholas M Child; Neil Maredia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Impact of Contrast Echocardiography on Assessment of Ventricular Function and Clinical Diagnosis in Routine Clinical Echocardiography: Korean Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Doo-Youp Kim; Jung-Hyun Choi; Geu-Ru Hong; Se-Joong Rim; Jang-Young Kim; Sang-Chol Lee; Il-Suk Sohn; Wook-Jin Chung; Hye-Sun Seo; Se-Jung Yoon; Kyoung-Im Cho; Si-Wan Choi; Kyung-Jin Lee
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-27

5.  LV thrombus detection by routine echocardiography: insights into performance characteristics using delayed enhancement CMR.

Authors:  Jonathan W Weinsaft; Han W Kim; Anna Lisa Crowley; Igor Klem; Chetan Shenoy; Lowie Van Assche; Rhoda Brosnan; Dipan J Shah; Eric J Velazquez; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07

Review 6.  Cardiotoxicity due to chemotherapy: role of cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Frédéric Poulin; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Improved Visualization in Difficult-to-Image Stress Echocardiography Patients Using Real-Time Harmonic Spatial Coherence Imaging.

Authors:  Dongwoon Hyun; Anna Lisa C Crowley; Melissa LeFevre; Jayne Cleve; Jarrett Rosenberg; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 8.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Steven B Feinstein; Blai Coll; Daniel Staub; Dan Adam; Arend F L Schinkel; Folkert J ten Cate; Kai Thomenius
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Molecular imaging in cardiovascular disease: Which methods, which diseases?

Authors:  Jonathan R Lindner; Albert Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Left ventricular stroke volume quantification by contrast echocardiography - comparison of linear and flow-based methods to cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Abiola O Dele-Michael; Kana Fujikura; Richard B Devereux; Fahmida Islam; Ingrid Hriljac; Sean R Wilson; Fay Lin; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 1.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.