Literature DB >> 19245741

Nutrigenetics and personalised nutrition: how far have we progressed and are we likely to get there?

Gerald Rimbach1, Anne M Minihane.   

Abstract

Nutrigenetics and personalised nutrition are components of the concept that in the future genotyping will be used as a means of defining dietary recommendations to suit the individual. Over the last two decades there has been an explosion of research in this area, with often conflicting findings reported in the literature. Reviews of the literature in the area of apoE genotype and cardiovascular health, apoA5 genotype and postprandial lipaemia and perilipin and adiposity are used to demonstrate the complexities of genotype-phenotype associations and the aetiology of apparent between-study inconsistencies in the significance and size of effects. Furthermore, genetic research currently often takes a very reductionist approach, examining the interactions between individual genotypes and individual disease biomarkers and how they are modified by isolated dietary components or foods. Each individual possesses potentially hundreds of 'at-risk' gene variants and consumes a highly-complex diet. In order for nutrigenetics to become a useful public health tool, there is a great need to use mathematical and bioinformatic tools to develop strategies to examine the combined impact of multiple gene variants on a range of health outcomes and establish how these associations can be modified using combined dietary strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19245741     DOI: 10.1017/S0029665109001116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc        ISSN: 0029-6651            Impact factor:   6.297


  8 in total

1.  Association between genetic variants in the Coenzyme Q10 metabolism and Coenzyme Q10 status in humans.

Authors:  Alexandra Fischer; Constance Schmelzer; Gerald Rimbach; Petra Niklowitz; Thomas Menke; Frank Döring
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 2.  Obesity: interactions of genome and nutrients intake.

Authors:  Miae Doo; Yangha Kim
Journal:  Prev Nutr Food Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Precision nutrition: hype or hope for public health interventions to reduce obesity?

Authors:  Angeline Chatelan; Murielle Bochud; Katherine L Frohlich
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Content of selected inorganic compounds in the eggs of hens kept in two different systems: organic and battery cage.

Authors:  Edyta Szymanek; Katarzyna Andraszek; Dorota Banaszewska; Kamil Drabik; Justyna Batkowska
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2019-07-18

5.  Use of Edible, Medicinal, and Aromatic Plants in Various Health Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation among Inhabitants in the Area of Thrace, North-Eastern Greece.

Authors:  Georgia-Eirini Deligiannidou; Chrysoula Kyrgou; Evangelia Nena; Vangelis G Manolopoulos; Eugenia Bezirtzoglou; Christos A Kontogiorgis; Theodoros C Constantinidis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Apolipoprotein E genotype and hepatitis C, HIV and herpes simplex disease risk: a literature review.

Authors:  Inga Kuhlmann; Anne Marie Minihane; Patricia Huebbe; Almut Nebel; Gerald Rimbach
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk-benefit trade-off.

Authors:  Aleksandra Berezowska; Arnout R H Fischer; Amber Ronteltap; Ivo A van der Lans; Hans C M van Trijp
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.523

8.  Consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition: The role of ambivalent feelings and eating context.

Authors:  Machiel J Reinders; Emily P Bouwman; Jos van den Puttelaar; Muriel C D Verain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.