Literature DB >> 19245359

Interlaboratory and interplatform comparison of microarray gene expression analysis of HepG2 cells exposed to benzo(a)pyrene.

Sarah L Hockley1, Karen Mathijs, Yvonne C M Staal, Daniel Brewer, Ian Giddings, Joost H M van Delft, David H Phillips.   

Abstract

Microarray technology is being used increasingly to study gene expression of biological systems on a large scale. Both interlaboratory and interplatform differences are known to contribute to variability in microarray data. In this study we have investigated data from different platforms and laboratories on the transcriptomic profile of HepG2 cells exposed to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). RNA samples generated in two different laboratories were analyzed using both Agilent oligonucleotide microarrays and Cancer Research UK (CR-UK) cDNA microarrays. Comparability of the expression profiles was assessed at various levels including correlation and overlap between the data, clustering of the data and affected biological processes. Overlap and correlation occurred, but it was not possible to deduce whether choice of platform or interlaboratory differences contributed more to the data variation. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering of the expression profiles indicated that the data were most clearly defined by duration of exposure to BaP, suggesting that laboratory and platform variability does not mask the biological effects. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to validate the two array platforms and indicated that false negatives, rather than false positives, are obtained with both systems. All together these results suggest that data from similar biological experiments analyzed on different microarray platforms can be combined to give a more complete transcriptomic profile. Each platform gives a slight variation in the BaP-gene expression response and, although it cannot be stated which is more correct, combining the two data sets is more informative than considering them individually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19245359     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2008.0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  11 in total

1.  Transcriptomic Changes in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae Following Benzo[a]pyrene Exposure.

Authors:  Xiefan Fang; Jone Corrales; Cammi Thornton; Tracy Clerk; Brian E Scheffler; Kristine L Willett
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  How consistent are we? Interlaboratory comparison study in fathead minnows using the model estrogen 17α-ethinylestradiol to develop recommendations for environmental transcriptomics.

Authors:  April Feswick; Meghan Isaacs; Adam Biales; Robert W Flick; David C Bencic; Rong-Lin Wang; Chris Vulpe; Marianna Brown-Augustine; Alex Loguinov; Francesco Falciani; Philipp Antczak; John Herbert; Lorraine Brown; Nancy D Denslow; Kevin J Kroll; Candice Lavelle; Viet Dang; Lynn Escalon; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Christopher J Martyniuk; Kelly R Munkittrick
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Upregulation of IGF2 is associated with an acquired resistance for cis-diamminedichloroplatinum in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takenori Ogawa; Kazumi Ogawa; Kiyoto Shiga; Toru Furukawa; Hiroki Nagase; Sho Hashimoto; Toshimitsu Kobayashi; Akira Horii
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Identifying biomarkers as diagnostic tools in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Valeria R Mas; Thomas F Mueller; Kellie J Archer; Daniel G Maluf
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  An untargeted multi-technique metabolomics approach to studying intracellular metabolites of HepG2 cells exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  Ainhoa Ruiz-Aracama; Ad Peijnenburg; Jos Kleinjans; Danyel Jennen; Joost van Delft; Caroline Hellfrisch; Arjen Lommen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Conservation and divergence of chemical defense system in the tunicate Oikopleura dioica revealed by genome wide response to two xenobiotics.

Authors:  Fekadu Yadetie; Stephen Butcher; Hilde E Førde; Coen Campsteijn; Jean-Marie Bouquet; Odd A Karlsen; France Denoeud; Raghu Metpally; Eric M Thompson; J Robert Manak; Anders Goksøyr; Daniel Chourrout
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  miRNA-target network reveals miR-124as a key miRNA contributing to clear cell renal cell carcinoma aggressive behaviour by targeting CAV1 and FLOT1.

Authors:  Henriett Butz; Peter M Szabó; Heba W Z Khella; Roy Nofech-Mozes; Attila Patocs; George M Yousef
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-05-20

Review 8.  Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Kirk J Mantione; Richard M Kream; Hana Kuzelova; Radek Ptacek; Jiri Raboch; Joshua M Samuel; George B Stefano
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2014-08-23

9.  Genome-Wide Functional and Stress Response Profiling Reveals Toxic Mechanism and Genes Required for Tolerance to Benzo[a]pyrene in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sean Timothy Francis O'Connor; Jiaqi Lan; Matthew North; Alexandre Loguinov; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; April Z Gu; Chris Vulpe
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Microarray experiments and factors which affect their reliability.

Authors:  Roman Jaksik; Marta Iwanaszko; Joanna Rzeszowska-Wolny; Marek Kimmel
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.