Literature DB >> 19243467

Context-dependent flight speed: evidence for energetically optimal flight speed in the bat Pipistrellus kuhlii?

Uri Grodzinski1, Orr Spiegel, Carmi Korine, Marc W Holderied.   

Abstract

1. Understanding the causes and consequences of animal flight speed has long been a challenge in biology. Aerodynamic theory is used to predict the most economical flight speeds, minimizing energy expenditure either per distance (maximal range speed, Vmr) or per time (minimal power speed, Vmp). When foraging in flight, flight speed also affects prey encounter and energy intake rates. According to optimal flight speed theory, such effects may shift the energetically optimal foraging speed to above Vmp. 2. Therefore, we predicted that if energetic considerations indeed have a substantial effect on flight speed of aerial-hawking bats, they will use high speed (close to Vmr) to commute from their daily roost to the foraging sites, while a slower speed (but still above Vmp) will be preferred during foraging. To test these predictions, echolocation calls of commuting and foraging Pipistrellus kuhlii were recorded and their flight tracks were reconstructed using an acoustic flight path tracking system. 3. Confirming our qualitative prediction, commuting flight was found to be significantly faster than foraging flight (9.3 vs. 6.7 m s(-1)), even when controlling for its lower tortuosity. 4. In order to examine our quantitative prediction, we compared observed flight speeds with Vmp and Vmr values generated for the study population using two alternative aerodynamic models, based on mass and wing morphology variables measured from bats we captured while commuting. The Vmp and Vmr values generated by one of the models were much lower than our measured flight speed. According to the other model used, however, measured foraging flight was faster than Vmp and commuting flight slightly slower than Vmr, which is in agreement with the predictions of optimal flight speed theory. 5. Thus, the second aerodynamic model we used seems to be a reasonable predictor of the different flight speeds used by the bats while foraging and while commuting. This supports the hypothesis that bats fly at a context-dependent, energetically optimal flight speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19243467     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01526.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  14 in total

1.  'No cost of echolocation for flying bats' revisited.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Daniel Lewanzik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Commuting fruit bats beneficially modulate their flight in relation to wind.

Authors:  Nir Sapir; Nir Horvitz; Dina K N Dechmann; Jakob Fahr; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The aerodynamic cost of flight in the short-tailed fruit bat (Carollia perspicillata): comparing theory with measurement.

Authors:  Rhea von Busse; Rye M Waldman; Sharon M Swartz; Christian C Voigt; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Power of the wingbeat: modelling the effects of flapping wings in vertebrate flight.

Authors:  M Klein Heerenbrink; L C Johansson; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  High manoeuvring costs force narrow-winged molossid bats to forage in open space.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 6.  Assessing the Risks to Bats from Plant Protection Products: A Review of the Recent European Food Safety Authority Statement Regarding Toxicity and Exposure Routes.

Authors:  A C Brooks; J Nopper; A Weyers; H Crosland; M Foudoulakis; S Haaf; M Hackett; A Lawrence
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.218

7.  Decision-making by a soaring bird: time, energy and risk considerations at different spatio-temporal scales.

Authors:  Roi Harel; Olivier Duriez; Orr Spiegel; Julie Fluhr; Nir Horvitz; Wayne M Getz; Willem Bouten; François Sarrazin; Ohad Hatzofe; Ran Nathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Illuminating the physiological implications of artificial light on an insectivorous bat community.

Authors:  Zachary M Cravens; Justin G Boyles
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities.

Authors:  Tessa A Rhinehart; Lauren M Chronister; Trieste Devlin; Justin Kitzes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Do you hear what I see? Vocalization relative to visual detection rates of Hawaiian hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus semotus).

Authors:  Paulo Marcos Gorresen; Paul M Cryan; Kristina Montoya-Aiona; Frank J Bonaccorso
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.