Literature DB >> 19242928

Genomic instability in giant cell tumor of bone. A study of 52 cases using DNA ploidy, relocalization FISH, and array-CGH analysis.

Linda Moskovszky1, Károly Szuhai, Tibor Krenács, Pancras C W Hogendoorn, Miklós Szendroi, Maria Serena Benassi, László Kopper, Tibor Füle, Zoltán Sápi.   

Abstract

Genetic instability in relation to clinical behavior was studied in 52 cases of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). Ploidy was determined in the mononuclear cell population by using native cell smears and image cytometry. A relocalization technique allowed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of CD68-negative neoplastic cells for numerical changes of chromosomes X, 3, 4, 6, 11, and telomeric association on 11p. Genome-wide alterations were tested using array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) on magnetically separated CD68-negative tumor cells. CTNNB1, TP53, and BCL2 protein expression was also analyzed in formol-paraffin sections to see if their pathways are involved in the development of chromosomal instability. CD68-positive histiocytes showed no significant numerical chromosome and telomeric alterations. Based on ploidy values and clinical outcome, we could distinguish five groups as follows: diploid nonrecurrent (n = 20), tetraploid nonrecurrent (n = 6), diploid recurrent (n = 5), tetraploid and/or aneuploid recurrent (n = 14), and malignant cases (n = 7). Random individual-cell aneusomy was significantly (P < 0.001) more frequent in the recurrent groups (36.01 +/- 11.94%) than in the benign nonrecurrent cases (10.65 +/- 3.66%). The diploid recurrent group showed significantly (P < 0.001) increased balanced aneusomy compared with the diploid nonrecurrent group and the tetraploid nonrecurrent group represented eusomic polysomy. Array-CGH and FISH showed clonal aberrations almost exclusively in the malignant group. None of the protein markers tested showed significant correlation with elevated aneuploidy/polysomy (P = 0.56). Our results show that ploidy determination combined with FISH analysis may help predicting recurrence potential of GCTB and suggest that chromosomal abnormalities superimposed on telomeric associations could be responsible for an aggressive clinical course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242928     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  12 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Authors:  Yifeng He; Ji Zhang; Xiaoyi Ding
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour.

Authors:  Shinji Tsukamoto; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Giulio Leone; Alberto Righi; Manabu Akahane; Piergiuseppe Tanzi; Akira Kido; Kanya Honoki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Davide Maria Donati; Costantino Errani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Integration of denosumab therapy in the management of giant cell tumors of bone.

Authors:  Daniel T Miles; Ryan T Voskuil; Wood Dale; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28

Review 4.  The clinical approach toward giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Lizz van der Heijden; P D Sander Dijkstra; Michiel A J van de Sande; Judith R Kroep; Remi A Nout; Carla S P van Rijswijk; Judith V M G Bovée; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Hans Gelderblom
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-09

Review 5.  RANK pathway in giant cell tumor of bone: pathogenesis and therapeutic aspects.

Authors:  Pan-Feng Wu; Ju-yu Tang; Kang-hua Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-25

6.  Histological and clinical characteristics of malignant giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Lihua Gong; Weifeng Liu; Xiaoqi Sun; Constantin Sajdik; Xinxia Tian; Xiaohui Niu; Xiaoyuan Huang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence.

Authors:  Aneta Maria Borkowska; Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz; Bartłomiej Szostakowski; Andrzej Pieńkowski; Piotr Lukasz Rutkowski
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  A case of recurrent giant cell tumor of bone with malignant transformation and benign pulmonary metastases.

Authors:  Ira J Miller; Alan Blank; Suellen M Yin; Allison McNickle; Robert Gray; Steven Gitelis
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  A short-term in vivo model for giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Anna Neumann; Károly Szuhai; Konstantin Agelopoulos; Christian August; Georg Gosheger; Pancras Cw Hogendoorn; Nick Athanasou; Horst Buerger; Martin Hagedorn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Prognostic impact of reduced connexin43 expression and gap junction coupling of neoplastic stromal cells in giant cell tumor of bone.

Authors:  Peter Balla; Mate Elod Maros; Gabor Barna; Imre Antal; Gergo Papp; Zoltan Sapi; Nicholas Anthony Athanasou; Maria Serena Benassi; Pierro Picci; Tibor Krenacs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.