Literature DB >> 19241171

Threats of cross-contamination on effects of a sexual risk reduction intervention: fact or fiction.

Delia L Lang1, Ralph J DiClemente, James W Hardin, Richard A Crosby, Laura F Salazar, Vicky S Hertzberg.   

Abstract

This study sought to empirically evaluate the extent and impact of cross-contamination on the effects of a STI/HIV intervention trial previously shown to be effective in reducing high-risk sexual behaviors among African-American adolescent females. Participants were recruited through community health agencies in the Southeastern United States and comprised 522 sexually active 14- to 18- year-old African-American females who completed self-administered questionnaires and face-to-face interviews at baseline, 6- and 12-month time points. Participants were randomized to a STI/HIV risk reduction group or a general health promotion group. The STI/HIV intervention group participated in four group sessions addressing constructs such as HIV knowledge, communication, condom use self-efficacy and condom use behaviors. The control group participated in four group sessions focused on general health topics. The study setting afforded multiple opportunities for cross-talk between intervention and control group participants. Consistent condom use, defined as condom use during every vaginal sex act, was the primary outcome measure. Other outcome measures included various sexual behaviors, observed condom application skills and psychosocial variables associated with HIV preventive behaviors. Approximately 73% of participants reported some level of cross-talk. Linear and binary GEE models assessing the impact of the STI/HIV intervention on contaminated vs. uncontaminated control group participants indicated no differential effects of the intervention. Furthermore, equivalence tests demonstrated that contaminated and uncontaminated control groups were equivalent. Findings from this study provide empirical evidence suggesting that behavioral and psychosocial outcomes may be resistant to cross-contamination in randomized controlled trials testing safer sex interventions among African-American adolescent females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19241171     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-009-0127-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  9 in total

Review 1.  Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer?

Authors:  D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

2.  Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.

Authors:  W W Tryon
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

3.  Control of error in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  M J Keirse; M Hanssens
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 4.  Expert consensus on contamination in educational trials elicited by a Delphi exercise.

Authors:  Amanda Howe; Marcus Keogh-Brown; Susan Miles; Max Bachmann
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups.

Authors:  J L Rogers; K I Howard; J T Vessey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women.

Authors:  G M Wingood; R J DiClemente
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2000-10

9.  Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ralph J DiClemente; Gina M Wingood; Kathy F Harrington; Delia L Lang; Susan L Davies; Edward W Hook; M Kim Oh; Richard A Crosby; Vicki Stover Hertzberg; Angelita B Gordon; James W Hardin; Shan Parker; Alyssa Robillard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for encouraging sexual behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan P Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Petra Harris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

2.  Sexual assault resistance education for university women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SARE trial).

Authors:  Charlene Y Senn; Misha Eliasziw; Paula C Barata; Wilfreda E Thurston; Ian R Newby-Clark; H Lorraine Radtke; Karen L Hobden
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.