Literature DB >> 19239978

Environmental factors modify carbon nutritional patterns and niche overlap between Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides strains from maize.

Paola Giorni1, Naresh Magan, Paola Battilani.   

Abstract

This study examined the utilization patterns of key carbon sources (CS, 24: including key sugars, amino acids and fatty acids) in maize by strains of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides under different water activity (a(w), 0.87-0.98 a(w)) and temperature (20-35 degrees C) values and compared the niche overlap indices (NOI) that estimate the in vitro CS utilization profiles [Wilson, M., Lindow, S.E., 1994. Coexistence among epiphytic bacterial populations mediated through nutritional resource partitioning. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60, 4468-4477.]. The ability to grow in these key CS in minimal media was studied for 120 h in 12 h steps. The NOI was calculated for inter-species (F. verticillioides-A. flavus) and for intra-species (A. flavus-A. flavus) using CS utilization patterns over the range of interacting environmental conditions. 30 degrees C, over the whole a(w) range examined, was found to be optimal for utilization of the maximum number of CS by A. flavus. In contrast, for F. verticillioides this was more so at 20 degrees C; 25 degrees C allowed a suboptimal usage of CS for both species. NOIs confirmed the nutritional dominance of A. flavus at 30 degrees C, especially at lower a(w) levels and that of F. verticillioides at 20 degrees C, mainly at 0.95 a(w). In other conditions of a(w), based on CS utilization patterns, the data indicated that A. flavus and F. verticillioides occupied different ecological niches. The variability in nutritional sources utilization between A. flavus strains was not related to their ability to produce aflatoxins (AFs). This type of data helps to explain the nutritional dominance of fungal species and strains under different environmental conditions. This could be useful in trying to find appropriate natural biocontrol microorganisms to compete with these mycotoxigenic species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239978     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  6 in total

1.  Nutrient environments influence competition among Aspergillus flavus genotypes.

Authors:  Hillary L Mehl; Peter J Cotty
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Environmental factors and interactions with mycobiota of grain and grapes: effects on growth, deoxynivalenol and ochratoxin production by Fusarium culmorum and Aspergillus carbonarius.

Authors:  Naresh Magan; David Aldred; Russell Hope; David Mitchell
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  Growth and enzymatic responses of phytopathogenic fungi to glucose in culture media and soil.

Authors:  Beatriz de Oliveira Costa; Ely Nahas
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Variation in fungal microbiome (mycobiome) and aflatoxins during simulated storage of in-shell peanuts and peanut kernels.

Authors:  Fuguo Xing; Ning Ding; Xiao Liu; Jonathan Nimal Selvaraj; Limin Wang; Lu Zhou; Yueju Zhao; Yan Wang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Variation in fungal microbiome (mycobiome) and aflatoxin in stored in-shell peanuts at four different areas of China.

Authors:  Ning Ding; Fuguo Xing; Xiao Liu; Jonathan N Selvaraj; Limin Wang; Yueju Zhao; Yan Wang; Wei Guo; Xiaofeng Dai; Yang Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides Interaction: Modeling the Impact on Mycotoxin Production.

Authors:  Marco Camardo Leggieri; Paola Giorni; Amedeo Pietri; Paola Battilani
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.