Literature DB >> 19239812

Training centers: an essential step to developing skills in urolaparoscopy.

Roland F van Velthoven1, Pierre Thierry Piechaud.   

Abstract

Choosing laparoscopy is an important investment for urologists, and it must be learned from basic principles to advance skills through a steep learning curve; the caseload is made of frequent but very demanding procedures. In training centers, scholars are confronted with real-life conditions through large animal models. For about 1500 urologists, the European Institute of Tele Surgery has offered such a program for a decade. We evaluate its impact through a self-administered, Internet-hosted questionnaire. Individual data concern number and type of courses attended, skill level and type of practice before training, and expectations at registration. Personal benefit is evaluated through the delay before starting routine laparoscopy or the major procedures volume facing open counterparts. The ability of this program to meet scholar's expectations is reflected by eventual need for further training or by trainee suggestions. In spite of 85% cumulated satisfaction index, further developments must improve practical training: clear, reproducible stepwise protocols, repeated under supervision in animal models today and hopefully in augmented reality simulators tomorrow. The knowledge transfer and companionship made of theoretical and practical lessons followed by a straight supervised application represent an essential model for gaining proficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239812     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-009-0018-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  7 in total

1.  Teaching laparoscopy: the new challenge.

Authors:  Alberto Pansadoro; Francesco Curto; Camille Mugnier; Jean-Luc Hoepffner; Richard Gaston; Thierry Piechaud
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Skills-based laparoscopy training demonstrates long-term transfer of clinical laparoscopic practice: additional follow-up.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Jay T Bishoff; Steven J Shichman; J Stuart Wolf; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy suture.

Authors:  M P Laguna; A Arce-Alcazar; C A Mochtar; R Van Velthoven; A Peltier; J J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Mentor-initiated approach in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Skrekas; Chaidir A Mochtar; Brunolf W Lagerveld; Theo M de Reijke; Roland F van Velthoven; Alexandre Peltier; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; M Pilar Laguna
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  A novel training model for laparoscopic pyeloplasty using chicken crop.

Authors:  Anil Ramachandran; Abraham Kurien; Pradip Patil; Stephanie Symons; Arvind Ganpule; Veeramani Muthu; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models.

Authors:  Roland F van Velthoven; Paul Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.862

7.  Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists.

Authors:  Peter D Vlaovic; Eric R Sargent; John R Boker; Federico A Corica; David S Chou; Corollos S Abdelshehid; Shannon M White; Leandro G Sala; Frank Chu; Todd Le; Ralph V Clayman; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.