Literature DB >> 19239762

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in poultry.

Davy Persoons1, Sebastiaan Van Hoorebeke, Katleen Hermans, Patrick Butaye, Aart de Kruif, Freddy Haesebrouck, Jeroen Dewulf.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been detected in several species and animal-derived products. To determine whether MRSA is present in poultry, we sampled 50 laying hens and 75 broiler chickens. MRSA was found in some broiler chickens but no laying hens. In all samples, spa type t1456 was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239762      PMCID: PMC2666289          DOI: 10.3201/eid1503.080696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Staphylococcus aureus is a well-known pathogen of humans and animals. Methicillin resistance in this bacterial species represents a threat to human health. Originally, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was a nosocomial pathogen, but in the 1990s, MRSA spread into communities worldwide. Recently, pigs were shown to be a major reservoir for MRSA multilocus sequence type 398 (ST398). Because this sequence type has also been isolated from other animal species, it is referred to as livestock-associated MRSA (). It has also shown potential for zoonotic transmission (). Among ST398 isolates, a variation in spa types has been found (). MRSA has been isolated from raw chicken meat or carcasses in Korea (,) and Japan (); however, these strains were human-associated and not the livestock-associated strains. Thus, the possibility of human contamination of poultry carcasses by slaughterhouse employees cannot be ruled out. We investigated whether livestock-associated MRSA is present in commercial broiler chickens and laying hens.

The Study

In 2007, from randomly selected farms in Belgium, we sampled 5 laying hens from each of 10 farms and 5 broiler chickens from each of 14 farms. One broiler farm was sampled twice (4 months apart, from different flocks in the same house, leaving 1 production round unsampled). Samples were taken from the cloaca and nasal cavity of these 50 laying hens and 75 broiler chickens. Samples were first incubated in a brain–heart infusion broth supplemented with nalidixic acid and colistin, each at a concentration of 10 µg/mL. After overnight incubation at 37°C, 1 µL of this broth was streaked onto an MRSA ChromID plate (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and incubated for 24–48 h at 37°C. To differentiate phenotypes of S. aureus, we purified colonies that showed typical growth on MRSA Chrom-ID plates by transferring them to modified Baird-Parker agar () and Columbia blood agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) for DNAse and catalase testing. The phenotypically identified MRSA strains were then confirmed by 16S rRNA-mecA-nuc triplex PCR as previously described (). For all strains, the spa type was determined, and for 3 strains, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed as described (). Relatedness with other spa types from porcine origin () was determined by using Ridom SpaServer software version 1.3 (Ridom GmbH; Würzburg, Germany; www.ridom.de/spa-server). Disk susceptibility of the strains was tested by using the Kirby-Bauer disk-diffusion method. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (M31-A3) were followed for inoculum standardization. After plates were incubated for 18 h, inhibition zones were measured in millimeters and interpreted according to Neo-Sensitabs manufacturer’s instructions (http://rosco.dk). S. aureus ATCC 25923 was included for internal quality control. MRSA was not isolated from any laying hen samples. This finding may indicate that MRSA is absent or present only in low numbers in laying hens, possibly because of the limited use of antimicrobial drugs in these animals. Use of certain antimicrobial drugs in human hospitals has been shown to be a risk factor for acquiring MRSA infection, especially when the chosen treatment is inappropriate or insufficient (). Antimicrobial-drug use may also be a risk factor for MRSA colonization of animals. The antimicrobial drugs used in the flocks included in this study were tylosin, amoxicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, lincomycin, tetracycline, and colistin. MRSA was isolated from 8 broiler chickens from 2 of the 14 farms sampled. Low prevalence in poultry has also been found by Kitai et al. () and Lee (), although they sampled chicken carcasses from slaughterhouses and did not find any livestock-associated strains. Given our relatively small sample size, our data did not permit us to estimate the within- and between-flock prevalence. In the MRSA-positive flocks, the number of positive samples varied between 1/5 (20%) and 5/5 (100%). From the 1 MRSA-positive farm that was sampled twice, MRSA was isolated on both occasions. This finding indicates that MRSA may persist on a farm and colonize future flocks. MRSA was found in nearly equal numbers from the nares samples and the cloaca samples. Of the 8 MRSA-positive animals (16 samples), MRSA was found in all samples except for 1 cloacal swab, for a total of 15 MRSA isolations. Susceptibility testing showed that all 15 isolated strains were resistant to erythromycin, kanamycin, tobramycin, lincomycin, tylosin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim. All strains were susceptible to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, linezolid, mupirocin, quinopristin-dalfopristin, rifampin, and sulfonamides. Molecular typing showed that the strains all belonged to spa type t1456 of the livestock-associated ST398, which is typically not typeable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. To our knowledge, this spa type has not been found in other animal species (,). Its relatedness to other spa types isolated from pigs is shown in the Table. A shortening of variable number tandem repeat composition seems to be present in spa type t1456. Whether t1456 is a clone typically associated with poultry, or specifically broiler chickens, and whether it is spreading internationally needs further investigation.
Table

Comparison of spa type methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pigs and poultry*

Sourcespa typeComposition†
Pigt011 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – – – 34 – 24 – 25
Pigt034 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – 02 – 25 – 34 – 24 – 25
Pigt108 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – – – – – 24 – 25
Pigt567 008 – – – 02 – 25 – – – – – – – 24 – 25
Pigt943 008 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – 25 – – – 24 – 25
Pigt1254 106 – 16 – 02 – 25 – – – – – 34 – 24 – 25
Pigt1255 008 – 16 – – – – – – – – – 34 – 24 – 25
Poultryt1456 008 – 16 – 02 – 25

*All spa types isolated from pigs were described in de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJM, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WDC, Boshuizen HC, et al. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007;122:366–72
†Variable number tandem repeat composition in the 3’ end of the spa gene.

*All spa types isolated from pigs were described in de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJM, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WDC, Boshuizen HC, et al. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007;122:366–72
†Variable number tandem repeat composition in the 3’ end of the spa gene.

Conclusions

We confirmed the presence of MRSA in broiler chickens, but we were unable to find it in laying hens. All isolates belonged to 1 spa type, t1456, and thus differed from the other strains belonging to ST398 isolated from other animal species in Belgium and abroad. Whether this spa type is typically associated with poultry still needs to be confirmed. More detailed data are also needed to gain further insight in the true within- and between-flock prevalence of MRSA in poultry and its evolution over time.
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative Staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures.

Authors:  N Maes; J Magdalena; S Rottiers; Y De Gheldre; M J Struelens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from cattle and chicken, and analyses of their mecA, mecR1 and mecI genes.

Authors:  John Hwa Lee
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2006-04-16       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 3.  Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals: a review.

Authors:  F C Leonard; B K Markey
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming.

Authors:  Xander W Huijsdens; Beatrix J van Dijke; Emile Spalburg; Marga G van Santen-Verheuvel; Max E O C Heck; Gerlinde N Pluister; Andreas Voss; Wim J B Wannet; Albert J de Neeling
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail raw chicken meat in Japan.

Authors:  Satoru Kitai; Akira Shimizu; Junichi Kawano; Eri Sato; Chisa Nakano; Tatsuya Uji; Hiroshi Kitagawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Methicillin (Oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans.

Authors:  John Hwa Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  MRSA in livestock animals-an epidemic waiting to happen?

Authors:  M Wulf; A Voss
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Baird-Parker medium supplemented with acriflavine, polymyxins and sulphonamide for the selective isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from heavily contaminated materials.

Authors:  L A Devriese
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1981-04

Review 9.  The effect of antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S J Dancer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M C Enright; N P Day; C E Davies; S J Peacock; B G Spratt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total
  31 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Activity of Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 Against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Isolated from Wound Infection.

Authors:  Ammar Algburi; Halah M Al-Hasani; Thurya K Ismael; Alyaa Abdelhameed; Richard Weeks; Aleksey M Ermakov; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Evaluation of different chromogenic media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in broilers.

Authors:  L J Pletinckx; J Dewulf; Y De Bleecker; G Rasschaert; B M Goddeeris; I De Man
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Occurrence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Turkey and broiler barns and contamination of air and soil surfaces in their vicinity.

Authors:  A Friese; J Schulz; K Zimmermann; B-A Tenhagen; A Fetsch; J Hartung; U Rösler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic.

Authors:  Michael Z David; Robert S Daum
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus of different origins based on the polymorphism of the spa gene: characterization of a novel spa type.

Authors:  Reza Hakimi Alni; Abdolmajid Mohammadzadeh; Pezhman Mahmoodi
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  PFGE diversity within the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal lineage ST398.

Authors:  Thijs Bosch; Albert J de Neeling; Leo M Schouls; Kim W van der Zwaluw; Jan A J W Kluytmans; Hajo Grundmann; Xander W Huijsdens
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Comparison of fingerprinting methods for typing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398.

Authors:  G Rasschaert; W Vanderhaeghen; I Dewaele; N Janez; X Huijsdens; P Butaye; M Heyndrickx
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Review of antimicrobial therapy of selected bacterial diseases in broiler chickens in Canada.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Dave Léger; Carolee Carson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.008

9.  Comparative genotypic and phenotypic characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolated from animals and humans.

Authors:  Dorota M Jamrozy; Mark D Fielder; Patrick Butaye; Nick G Coldham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transmission Dynamics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Pigs.

Authors:  Florence Crombé; M Angeles Argudín; Wannes Vanderhaeghen; Katleen Hermans; Freddy Haesebrouck; Patrick Butaye
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.