Literature DB >> 19239511

Economic evaluation of nursing practices: a review of literature.

K Lämås1, A Willman, L Lindholm, C Jacobsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of cost-effectiveness of nursing practices and its influence on prioritizations has been discussed in literature. It is, however, unclear to what extent health economic analysis has been used in the area of nursing. AIM: The aim of this paper was to investigate how studies of nursing practices apply economic evaluations.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted that included studies through August 2007. The search was performed using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Econlit, DARE, HTA, NHS EED, Cochrane reviews and clinical trials with a search term connected to nursing and health economics. Protocols were used in the screening procedure and the result is reported in a descriptive form.
RESULTS: The search identified 115 studies published between 1984 and August 2007. Studies were found in the following nursing practices: provision of support and treatment (n = 17); assessing suffering/well-being (n = 1); preventing or treating ill health (n = 53); and organization of individual care (n = 44). In 22% of all studies, the authors explicitly presented the health economic method used. In 25% of all studies, the perspective of the economic analysis was explicitly stated and a large variability in cost was considered in the analysis. In 82 studies, the authors reported cost-effective intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Although economic evaluation of nursing practice has increased, it is still a rather small area. According to the items elucidated in this study, further methodological improvement is needed to evaluate the economics of nursing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239511     DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00672.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Nurs Rev        ISSN: 0020-8132            Impact factor:   2.871


  2 in total

1.  Quantity and Quality of Economic Evaluations in U.S. Nursing Research, 1997-2015: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Wendy A Cook; Megan L Morrison; Linda H Eaton; Brian R Theodore; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Development and evaluation of a home enteral nutrition team.

Authors:  Sarah Dinenage; Morwenna Gower; Joanna Van Wyk; Anne Blamey; Karen Ashbolt; Michelle Sutcliffe; Sue M Green
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.