Literature DB >> 19238886

Influence of insertion site on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews.

Georgios Tsaousidis1, Oskar Bauss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of various insertion sites on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 76 orthodontic miniscrews were inserted in 59 patients: 20 in the buccal and 18 in the palatal side of the maxilla, and 38 in the buccal side of the mandible. We attempted to insert all the screws at a minimum depth of at least 5 mm.
RESULTS: The total failure rate was 18.4% on average (n = 14). Orthodontic miniscrews in the palatal side of the maxilla failed at a significantly higher rate than miniscrews in the buccal side of the mandible (p < 0.001); they also failed at a significantly higher failure rate during the first 3 months after insertion than did miniscrews in the buccal side of the maxilla (p = 0.003) or mandible (p < 0.001). We also observed a significant correlation between failure rate and screw length, with the shorter miniscrews showing significantly higher failure rates (r = -0.743; r2 = 0.552; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Insertion site seems to affect the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews. To ensure that orthodontic miniscrews have adequate stability in the palatal side of the maxilla, the insertion depth should exceed 5 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19238886     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-008-0809-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  7 in total

1.  Effect of smoking on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Emad Bayat; Oskar Bauss
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants: part II: implant removal.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Andreas Jäger; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Patient expectations, acceptance and preferences in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants. A randomly controlled study. Part I: insertion techniques.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  An interview with Benedict Wilmes.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Marcus Vinícius Neiva Nunes do Rego; Jorge Faber; Ki Beom Kim
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

5.  Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction.

Authors:  Rebecca Metzner; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Influence of interradicular and palatal placement of orthodontic mini-implants on the success (survival) rate.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Georgios Kanavakis; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Comparison of mechanical and biological properties of zirconia and titanium alloy orthodontic micro-implants.

Authors:  Hae Won Choi; Young Seok Park; Shin Hye Chung; Min Ho Jung; Won Moon; Sang Hoon Rhee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.