Marijke Proesmans1, Kris De Boeck. 1. Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. marijke.proesmans@uz.kuleuven.be
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of empyema in children is increasing. Adequate knowledge of treatment modalities is therefore essential for every pediatrician. At the university hospital of Leuven, the incidence per 100,000 admissions increased from 40 in 1993 to 120 in 2005. The treatment of choice, however, is still a matter of debate. This is mainly due to the scarcity of prospective randomized trials in children but is further complicated by the absence of uniform terminology. This review starts with clarifying definitions of empyema and complicated versus noncomplicated parapneumonic effusion. The place of different imaging techniques--ultrasound, chest X-ray, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging--is illustrated. All treatment steps are evaluated starting with antibiotic choices, duration of i.v. and oral antibiotics, pleural fluid analysis, indications for chest drain placement, and fibrinolysis. As to the surgical interventions, there is at present insufficient evidence that early surgery is superior to noninvasive medical treatment. Therefore, video-assisted thoracoscopy cannot be advised as general first-line therapy. CONCLUSION: Since the pathogenicity of empyema is a dynamic process, therapeutic strategy must be decided based on empyema stage and clinical experience. Each referral center should agree on a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart based on current evidence and local expertise. The flow chart outlined for our center is presented.
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of empyema in children is increasing. Adequate knowledge of treatment modalities is therefore essential for every pediatrician. At the university hospital of Leuven, the incidence per 100,000 admissions increased from 40 in 1993 to 120 in 2005. The treatment of choice, however, is still a matter of debate. This is mainly due to the scarcity of prospective randomized trials in children but is further complicated by the absence of uniform terminology. This review starts with clarifying definitions of empyema and complicated versus noncomplicated parapneumonic effusion. The place of different imaging techniques--ultrasound, chest X-ray, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging--is illustrated. All treatment steps are evaluated starting with antibiotic choices, duration of i.v. and oral antibiotics, pleural fluid analysis, indications for chest drain placement, and fibrinolysis. As to the surgical interventions, there is at present insufficient evidence that early surgery is superior to noninvasive medical treatment. Therefore, video-assisted thoracoscopy cannot be advised as general first-line therapy. CONCLUSION: Since the pathogenicity of empyema is a dynamic process, therapeutic strategy must be decided based on empyema stage and clinical experience. Each referral center should agree on a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart based on current evidence and local expertise. The flow chart outlined for our center is presented.
Authors: Carrie L Byington; LaShonda Y Spencer; Timothy A Johnson; Andrew T Pavia; Daniel Allen; Edward O Mason; Sheldon Kaplan; Karen C Carroll; Judy A Daly; John C Christenson; Matthew H Samore Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-01-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Samatha Sonnappa; Gordon Cohen; Catherine M Owens; Carin van Doorn; John Cairns; Sanja Stanojevic; Martin J Elliott; Adam Jaffé Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Marijke Proesmans; Brenda Gijsens; Patricia Van de Wijdeven; Herbert De Caluwe; Jan Verhaegen; Katrien Lagrou; Ellen Van Even; Francois Vermeulen; Kris De Boeck Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Emily Allin; Nassr Nama; Michael A Irvine; Colleen Pawliuk; Marie Wright; Matthew Carwana Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Koen Huysentruyt; Philippe Alliet; Marc Raes; Julie Willekens; Iris De Schutter; Elke De Wachter; Anne Malfroot; Thierry Devreker; Philippe Goyens; Yvan Vandenplas; Jean De Schepper Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240