Literature DB >> 19238067

Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann procedure.

Manuela Petersen1, Ferdinand Köckerling, Hans Lippert, Hubert Scheidbach.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann procedure is an operation associated with a lengthy stay in hospital, protracted convalescence, and a high morbidity rate. With the aim of using the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, such as rapid mobilization, less postoperative pain, early restoration of bowel function, and a rapid return to a normal diet, and reduced morbidity, the laparoscopic modality was employed. The objective of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann procedure.
METHOD: A total of 71 patients who, in the period between 1995 and 2005 within the framework of the prospective multicenter study "Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group," underwent a laparoscopically assisted restoration of bowel continuity following Hartmann procedure, were investigated.
RESULTS: In 62 patients (87%), the laparoscopic procedure was completed as planned, whereas 9 cases had to be converted to open surgery-mostly on account of massive intra-abdominal adhesions. The 39 male (55%) and 32 female (45%) patients had an average body mass index of 25 (range, 19 to 38), a height of 168 cm (range, 150 to 190 cm), and a weight of 72 kg (range, 49 to 103 kg). Mean operating time was 164 min (range, 60 to 410 min) and the intraoperative blood loss 196 mL (range, 10 to 1000 mL). Five patients (7%) received packed red cells. In all, 85.9% of the procedures (n=61) were free of complications. The most common intraoperative complications were injuries to the bowel and problems with the anastomosis (dehiscence, difficult stapling), each occurring in 5.6% of the cases (n=4). Intraoperative lesions to the ureters (0%), the bladder (n=1/1.4%), and blood vessels (n=1/1.4%) played a numerically subordinate role. Purely parenteral nutrition was applied up to the third postoperative day (range, 0 to seventh postoperative day). In those patients who were able to take a liquid meal on the third postoperative day (range, first to eighth postoperative day), enteral nutrition was initiated on the fifth postoperative day (range, second to tenth postoperative day). On average, bowel movements were restored on the fourth postoperative day (range, second to ninth postoperative day). Patients in whom a bladder catheter was placed for the operation had it removed on the third postoperative day (range, first to twelfth postoperative day) and had normal urination thereafter. In Hartmann procedure, patients without such a catheter, normal urination was possible from postoperative day 1 onward (range, 0 to second postoperative day). Postoperative complications included hematomas/abscesses (n=3/4.2%), transit disorders (n=2/2.8%), surgery-requiring ileus (n=2/2.8%), cardiopulmonary complications (n=1/1.4%), and surgery-requiring hemorrhage (n=1/1.4%), with other complications accounting for 4.2% (n=3). The median hospital stay was 11 days (range, 5 to 35 d); the mortality rate was 1.4% (n=1).
CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of Hartmann procedure employing the laparoscopic modality is compatible with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. The elevated conversion rate is a reflection of the fact that the operation is technically demanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19238067     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318188bef5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  10 in total

1.  Author reply to the letter to the editor, Re: 'Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure-a comparative retrospective analysis.' Surgical Endoscopy 2008(23):496-502.

Authors:  Celia M Divino; Haggi Mazeh; Alexander J Greenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Valentino Fiscon; Giuseppe Portale; Antonio Mazzeo; Giovanni Migliorini; Flavio Frigo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 3.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?

Authors:  Alessandra Lucchetta; Nicolò De Manzini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 4.  Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall; Werner A Draaisma; Esther S Schouten; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Comparison between open and laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.

Authors:  Nicola De'angelis; Francesco Brunetti; Riccardo Memeo; Jose Batista da Costa; Anne Sophie Schneck; Maria Clotilde Carra; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-27

6.  Laparoscopic versus open reversal of a Hartmann procedure: a single-center study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Martin Hoffmann; Tilman Laubert; Karl-Frederik Meyer; Thomas Jungbluth; Uwe-Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Erik Schlöricke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Joong-Min Park; Kyong-Choun Chi
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-03-27

8.  Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal: Application of a Single-Port Approach Through the Colostomy Site.

Authors:  Byung Mo Kang; Chang Woo Kim; Suk-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-12-04

9.  Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients.

Authors:  Anwar Medellin Abueta; Nairo Javier Senejoa; Mauricio Pedraza Ciro; Lina Fory; Carlos Perez Rivera; Carlos Edmundo Martinez Jaramillo; Lina Maria Mateus Barbosa; Heinz Orlando Ibañez Varela; Javier A Carrera; Rafael Garcia Duperly; Luis A Sanchez; Ivan David Lozada-Martinez; Luis Felipe Cabrera-Vargas; Andres Mendoza; Paulo Cabrera; Sebastian Sanchez Ussa; Cristian Paez; Steven D Wexner; Victor Strassmann; Giovanna DaSilva; Salomone Di Saverio; Arianna Birindelli; Roberto Jose Rodríguez Florez; Abraham Kestenberg; Alexander Obando Rodallega; Juan Carlos Sánchez Robles; Carlos Adrian Niño Carrasco; Alessio Impagnatiello; Diletta Cassini; Gianandrea Baldazzi; Francesco Roscio; Gianluca Liotta; Pierluigi Marini; Daniel Gomez; Carlos Edgar Figueroa Avendaño; Daniela Moreno Villamizar; Laura Cabrera; Juan Carlos Reyes; Alexis Narvaez-Rojas
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 10.  Laparoscopic Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: State of the Art 20 Years after the First Reported Case.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Annalisa Ardiri; Maurizio Mannino; Antonio Politi; Andrea Di Stefano; Zia Aftab; Abdelrahman Abdelaal; Maria Concetta Arcerito; Andrea Cavallaro; Marco Cavallaro; Gaetano Bertino; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.