Literature DB >> 19236995

A true blind for subjects who receive spinal manipulation therapy.

Gregory N Kawchuk1, Rick Haugen, Julie Fritz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if short-duration anesthesia (propofol and remifentanil) can blind subjects to the provision or withholding of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).
DESIGN: Placebo control.
SETTING: Day-procedure ward, University of Alberta Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Human subjects with uncomplicated low back pain (LBP) (n=6).
INTERVENTIONS: In each subject, propofol and remifentanil were administered intravenously. Once unconsciousness was achieved (3-5min), subjects were placed in a lateral recumbent position and then randomized to either a control group (n=3) or an experimental group (with SMT, n=3); subjects received a single SMT to the lumbar spine. Subjects were given a standardized auditory and visual cue and then allowed to recover from anesthesia in a supine position (3-5min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Before anesthesia and 30 minutes after recovery, a blinded evaluator asked each subject to quantify their LBP by using an 11-point scale. This same evaluator then assessed the ability of each subject to recall specific memories while under presumed anesthesia including events related to treatment and specific auditory and visual cues.
RESULTS: In either the experimental or control group, subjects could not recall any event while under anesthesia. Some SMT subjects reported pain reduction greater than the minimally important clinical difference and greater than control subjects. No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-duration, low-risk general anesthesia can create effective blinding of subjects to the provision or withholding of SMT. An anesthetic blind for SMT subjects solves many, if not all, problems associated with prior SMT blinding strategies. Although further studies are needed to refine this technique, the potential now exists to conduct the first placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial to assess SMT efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236995     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.08.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  8 in total

1.  The effect of spinal manipulation on imbalances in leg strength.

Authors:  Philip D Chilibeck; Stephen M Cornish; Al Schulte; Nathan Jantz; Charlene R A Magnus; Shane Schwanbeck; Bernhard H J Juurlink
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2011-09

2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans.

Authors:  R E Liebano; C G Vance; B A Rakel; J E Lee; N A Cooper; S Marchand; D M Walsh; K A Sluka
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Spinal Manipulation Vs Sham Manipulation for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay K Ruddock; Hannah Sallis; Andy Ness; Rachel E Perry
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

4.  The objective evaluation of effectiveness of manual treatment of spinal function disturbances.

Authors:  Paweł Szulc; Jacek Lewandowski; Joanna Boch-Kmieciak; Paweł Berski; Marta Matusiak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-05

5.  A randomised controlled trial of preventive spinal manipulation with and without a home exercise program for patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Johanne Martel; Claude Dugas; Jean-Daniel Dubois; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on local and remote pressure pain threshold and pinprick sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Sasha L Dorron; Barrett E Losco; Peter D Drummond; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-12-05

7.  The effects of a single session of lumbar spinal manipulative therapy in terms of physical performance test symmetry in asymptomatic athletes: a single-blinded, randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Bruno A P Alvarenga; Ricardo Fujikawa; Filipa João; Jerusa P R Lara; António P Veloso
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-11-28

8.  Sham treatment effects in manual therapy trials on back pain patients: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolina Lavazza; Margherita Galli; Alessandra Abenavoli; Alberto Maggiani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.