Literature DB >> 19236927

A stimulus-locked vector autoregressive model for slow event-related fMRI designs.

Wesley K Thompson1, Greg Siegle.   

Abstract

Neuroscientists have become increasingly interested in exploring dynamic relationships among brain regions. Such a relationship, when directed from one region toward another, is denoted by "effective connectivity." An fMRI experimental paradigm which is well-suited for examination of effective connectivity is the slow event-related design. This design presents stimuli at sufficient temporal spacing for determining within-trial trajectories of BOLD activation, allowing for the analysis of stimulus-locked temporal covariation of brain responses in multiple regions. This may be especially important for emotional stimuli processing, which can evolve over the course of several seconds, if not longer. However, while several methods have been devised for determining fMRI effective connectivity, few are adapted to event-related designs, which include nonstationary BOLD responses and multiple levels of nesting. We propose a model tailored for exploring effective connectivity of multiple brain regions in event-related fMRI designs--a semi-parametric adaptation of vector autoregressive (VAR) models, termed "stimulus-locked VAR" (SloVAR). Connectivity coefficients vary as a function of time relative to stimulus onset, are regularized via basis expansions, and vary randomly across subjects. SloVAR obtains flexible, data-driven estimates of effective connectivity and hence is useful for building connectivity models when prior information on dynamic regional relationships is sparse. Indices derived from the coefficient estimates can also be used to relate effective connectivity estimates to behavioral or clinical measures. We demonstrate the SloVAR model on a sample of clinically depressed and normal controls, showing that early but not late cortico-amygdala connectivity appears crucial to emotional control and early but not late cortico-cortico connectivity predicts depression severity in the depressed group, relationships that would have been missed in a more traditional VAR analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236927      PMCID: PMC2674141          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  27 in total

1.  How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data?

Authors:  E Bullmore; B Horwitz; G Honey; M Brammer; S Williams; T Sharma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Effective connectivity and intersubject variability: using a multisubject network to test differences and commonalities.

Authors:  Andrea Mechelli; Will D Penny; Cathy J Price; Darren R Gitelman; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Alard Roebroeck; Dae-Shik Kim; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity.

Authors:  Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Empirical Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  F de Pasquale; C Del Gratta; G L Romani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dynamic causal modelling.

Authors:  K J Friston; L Harrison; W Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series.

Authors:  L Harrison; W D Penny; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Can't shake that feeling: event-related fMRI assessment of sustained amygdala activity in response to emotional information in depressed individuals.

Authors:  Greg J Siegle; Stuart R Steinhauer; Michael E Thase; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Pathways for emotion: interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  H T Ghashghaei; H Barbas
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Prefrontal contributions to executive control: fMRI evidence for functional distinctions within lateral Prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  A D Wagner; A Maril; R A Bjork; D L Schacter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Santosh B Katwal; Victoria L Morgan; Christopher L Asplund; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  A graphical vector autoregressive modelling approach to the analysis of electronic diary data.

Authors:  Beate Wild; Michael Eichler; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Mechthild Hartmann; Stephan Zipfel; Wolfgang Herzog
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Investigating neural primacy in Major Depressive Disorder: multivariate Granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI time-series data.

Authors:  J P Hamilton; G Chen; M E Thomason; M E Schwartz; I H Gotlib
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  Neural substrates of trait ruminations in depression.

Authors:  Darcy Mandell; Greg J Siegle; Luann Shutt; Josh Feldmiller; Michael E Thase
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2014-02

5.  Altered functional brain dynamics in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome during facial affect processing.

Authors:  Raquel E Gur; Dani S Bassett; Eli J Cornblath; Arun Mahadevan; Xiaosong He; Kosha Ruparel; David M Lydon-Staley; Tyler M Moore; Ruben C Gur; Elaine H Zackai; Beverly Emanuel; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Daniel H Wolf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; David R Roalf
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 13.437

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.