Literature DB >> 19236605

Use of the response of photosynthesis to oxygen to estimate mesophyll conductance to carbon dioxide in water-stressed soybean leaves.

James A Bunce1.   

Abstract

Methods of estimating the mesophyll conductance (g(m)) to the movement of CO(2) from the substomatal airspace to the site of fixation are expensive or rely upon numerous assumptions. It is proposed that, for C(3) species, measurement of the response of photosynthesis to [O(2)] at limiting [CO(2)], combined with a standard biochemical model of photosynthesis, can provide an estimate of g(m). This method was used to determine whether g(m) changed with [CO(2)] and with water stress in soybean leaves. The value of g(m) estimated using the O(2) response method agreed with values obtained using other methods. The g(m) was unchanged over the tested range of substomatal [CO(2)]. Water stress, which decreased stomatal conductance (g(s)) by about 80%, did not affect g(m), while the model parameter V(Cmax) was reduced by about 25%. Leaves with g(s) reduced by about 90% had g(m) values reduced by about 50%, while V(Cmax) was reduced by about 64%. It is concluded that g(m) in C(3) species can be conveniently estimated using the response of photosynthesis to [O(2)] at limiting [CO(2)], and that g(m) in soybean was much less sensitive to water stress than g(s), and was somewhat less sensitive to water stress than V(Cmax).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236605     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01966.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  8 in total

1.  Influence of diurnal variation in mesophyll conductance on modelled 13C discrimination: results from a field study.

Authors:  Christopher P Bickford; David T Hanson; Nate G McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Genotypically Identifying Wheat Mesophyll Conductance Regulation under Progressive Drought Stress.

Authors:  Katarina Olsovska; Marek Kovar; Marian Brestic; Marek Zivcak; Pavol Slamka; Hong Bo Shao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Variation among Soybean Cultivars in Mesophyll Conductance and Leaf Water Use Efficiency.

Authors:  James Bunce
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-11

4.  Cellular perspectives for improving mesophyll conductance.

Authors:  Marjorie R Lundgren; Andrew J Fleming
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  A Comparison of the Variable J and Carbon-Isotopic Composition of Sugars Methods to Assess Mesophyll Conductance from the Leaf to the Canopy Scale in Drought-Stressed Cherry.

Authors:  Giovanni Marino; Matthew Haworth; Andrea Scartazza; Roberto Tognetti; Mauro Centritto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Three Methods of Estimating Mesophyll Conductance Agree Regarding its CO₂ Sensitivity in the Rubisco-Limited Ci Range.

Authors:  James Bunce
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-05

7.  Endophytes alleviate the elevated CO2-dependent decrease in photosynthesis in rice, particularly under nitrogen limitation.

Authors:  Hyungmin Rho; Sharon Lafferty Doty; Soo-Hyung Kim
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Variation in Responses of Photosynthesis and Apparent Rubisco Kinetics to Temperature in Three Soybean Cultivars.

Authors:  James Bunce
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.