Literature DB >> 19235738

The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance.

Bertold Renner1, Christian A Mueller, Juergen Dreier, Stefanie Faulhaber, Wolfgang Rascher, Gerd Kobal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an olfactory test kit suitable for children and adults based on retronasal smelling of aromas combined with a sweet taste. Moreover, to explore the age limit at which olfactory testing is feasible and to extend the normative database for the validated "Sniffin' Sticks" test regarding children of younger ages. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized three-way crossover study in healthy children and adults.
METHODS: : The newly developed Candy Smell Test (CST, 23 aromatized sorbitol candies) was presented using a four-alternative, forced-choice procedure. First, 353 healthy subjects (230 children and 123 adults) were investigated in three separate sessions with the CST and the validated "Sniffin' Sticks" (composed of odor threshold, discrimination, and identification tasks). Both tests were then compared in 124 patients with olfactory disorders.
RESULTS: Test-retest reliability showed good reproducibility of the data obtained with the CST on 2 days (r(287) = 0.75, P < .001). Test results correlated significantly with the "Sniffin' Sticks" score (r(366) = 0.84, P < .001), although the CST proves to be much easier. The age limit for obtaining valid data was 7 years for both tests. The cutoff limit for the CST scores to separate normosmics from dysosmics was a score of 16 or less out of 23. Anosmia (cutoff score <or=13) was detected with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 83%.
CONCLUSIONS: The CST is an easy-to-use, reliable, and fast test of retronasal olfactory performance suitable for the screening of smell function in children above the age of 6 years and adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235738     DOI: 10.1002/lary.20123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  21 in total

1.  Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding; Peter Hellings; Isam Alobid; Claus Bachert; Wytske Fokkens; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Philippe Gevaert; Josep Guilemany; Livije Kalogjera; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol; Giovanni Passalacqua; Elina Toskala; Cornelius van Drunen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.871

2.  Retronasal testing of olfactory function: an investigation and comparison in seven countries.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Heike Hoffmann; Carl Philpott; Philippe Rombaux; Antje Welge-Luessen; Jan Vodicka; Iordanis Konstantinidis; Eduardo Morera; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Diagnosis of olfactory disorders].

Authors:  V A Schriever; N Abolmaali; A Welge-Lüssen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Olfactory dysfunction : Update on diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  M Kühn; N Abolmaali; M Smitka; D Podlesek; T Hummel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Retronasal olfactory testing in early diagnosed and suspected COVID-19 patients: a 7-week follow-up study.

Authors:  Bernhard Prem; David Tianxiang Liu; Gerold Besser; Bertold Renner; Christian Albert Mueller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Positive relationship between odor identification and affective responses of negatively valenced odors.

Authors:  Lenka Martinec Nováková; Dagmar Plotěná; S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-11

7.  Changes of olfactory abilities in relation to age: odor identification in more than 1400 people aged 4 to 80 years.

Authors:  A Sorokowska; V A Schriever; V Gudziol; C Hummel; A Hähner; E Iannilli; C Sinding; M Aziz; H S Seo; S Negoias; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Longer latency of sensory response to intravenous odor injection predicts olfactory neural disorder.

Authors:  Shu Kikuta; Yu Matsumoto; Akihito Kuboki; Tsuguhisa Nakayama; Daiya Asaka; Nobuyoshi Otori; Hiromi Kojima; Takashi Sakamoto; Kashio Akinori; Kaori Kanaya; Rumi Ueha; Ryoji Kagoya; Hironobu Nishijima; Makiko Toma-Hirano; Yayoi Kikkawa; Kenji Kondo; Koichi Tsunoda; Tempei Miyaji; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Kazunori Kataoka; Kensaku Mori; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effects of diversity in olfactory environment on children's sense of smell.

Authors:  Lenka Martinec Nováková; Jitka Fialová; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An investigation of retronasal testing of olfactory function in a Turkish population.

Authors:  Murat Salihoglu; Aytug Altundag; Melih Cayonu; Hakan Tekeli
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.