Literature DB >> 19235570

Prostate cancer treatment in Europe at the end of 1990s.

Gemma Gatta1, Giulia Zigon, Antoine Buemi, Jan Willem Coebergh, Marc Colonna, Paolo Contiero, Louis Denis, Pascale Grosclaude, Ann Valèrie Guizard, Maria Jose Sanchez-Perez, Ivan Plesko, Martina Ondrusova, Jadwiga Rachtan, Riccardo Valdagni, Michael Velten, Marina Vercelli, Franco Berrino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is wide variation in prostate cancer incidence and survival across Europe. In many countries incidence is rising sharply in relation to the introduction of prostate-specific antigen assay, and there is concern that patients may not be treated appropriately. We therefore aimed to characterize treatment for prostate cancer across Europe.
METHODS: We performed a high resolution population-based study, collecting information on the treatment of 3 486 prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 1995-1999 in 11 cancer registries from six European countries.
RESULTS: Overall, about one in three patients received radical treatment (prostatectomy 23% or radiotherapy 14%); about 60% of younger patients (<70 years) received radical treatment, while a similar proportion of older patients (> or =70 years) received palliation (transurethral prostatectomy or hormone treatment only). A considerable proportion (61%) of patients with apparently high-risk disease were treated radically within a year of diagnosis, with large variation between regions: >70% in Calvados, Haut-Rhin, Tarn and Eindhoven and <50% in Slovakia and Cracow. Overall 34% of patients with apparently low-risk disease received radical treatment, varying from 17% and 22% in Bas-Rhin and Granada, to 52% and 56% in Calvados and Eindhoven.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate wide variation in the treatment for prostate cancer even among patients with apparently similar disease, and further suggest a non-negligible proportion may be receiving inappropriate radical treatment for apparently low-risk disease. Current guidelines indicate active surveillance should become the main means of managing low-risk disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235570     DOI: 10.1080/02841860902719174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  3 in total

1.  Comparing cancer care, outcomes, and costs across health systems: charting the course.

Authors:  Joseph Lipscomb; K Robin Yabroff; Mark C Hornbrook; Anna Gigli; Silvia Francisci; Murray Krahn; Gemma Gatta; Annalisa Trama; Debra P Ritzwoller; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Ramzi Salloum; Neetu Chawla; Catia Angiolini; Emanuele Crocetti; Francesco Giusti; Stefano Guzzinati; Maura Mezzetti; Guido Miccinesi; Angela Mariotto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

2.  Prostate cancer radiotherapy in Austria: overview on number of patients, intention to treat, and treatment techniques based on data from 2007.

Authors:  Gregor Goldner; Samir Sljivic; Renee Oismueller; Johanna Salinger; Michael Mittermüller; Tanja Langsenlehner; Walter Harder; Gerhard Kametriser; Helmut Eiter; Elisabeth Nechvile
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Clinical intervals and diagnostic characteristics in a cohort of prostate cancer patients in Spain: a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Xavier Bonfill; María José Martinez-Zapata; Robin W M Vernooij; María José Sánchez; María Morales Suárez-Varela; Javier de la Cruz; José Ignacio Emparanza; Montserrat Ferrer; José Ignacio Pijoán; Juan M Ramos-Goñi; Joan Palou; Stefanie Schmidt; Víctor Abraira; Javier Zamora
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.