Literature DB >> 19235413

Weighted kappa for multiple raters.

Kenneth J Berry1, Janis E Johnston, Paul W Mielke.   

Abstract

Five procedures to calculate the probability of weighted kappa with multiple raters under the null hypothesis of independence are described and compared in terms of accuracy, ease of use, generality, and limitations. The five procedures are (1) exact variance, (2) resampling contingency, (3) intraclass correlation, (4) randomized block, and (5) resampling block. While each procedure possesses strengths and limitations, the resampling contingency procedure is shown to be the most versatile and accurate of the five procedures, provided the number of raters is not too large. The resampling contingency procedure permits any weighting scheme, accommodates both symmetrical and asymmetrical weights, is suitable for both weighted and unweighted kappa, and makes no assumptions about either the data distribution or the probability distribution.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19235413     DOI: 10.2466/pms.107.3.837-848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  9 in total

1.  Patients Decision Aid System Based on FHIR Profiles.

Authors:  Ilia Semenov; Georgy Kopanitsa; Dmitry Denisov; Yakovenko Alexandr; Roman Osenev; Yury Andreychuk
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Inter-rater reliability in the radiological classification of renal injuries.

Authors:  Elias J Pretorius; Amir D Zarrabi; Stephanie Griffith-Richards; Justin Harvey; Hilgard M Ackermann; Catharina M Meintjes; Willem G Cilliers; Moleen Zunza; Alexander J Szpytko; Richard D Pitcher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Inter-rater reliability of scapular dyskinesis classification in overhead athletes by entry-level physical therapy students.

Authors:  Juan Guerrero-Henriquez; Mauricio Oyarce-Mella; Jimmy Reyes Rocabado; David Olivares-Ponce; Omar Olivares-Lee; Stefano Pérez-Pasten; Martin Vargas-Matamala
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-08-30

5.  A measure of association for ordered categorical data in population-based studies.

Authors:  Kerrie P Nelson; Don Edwards
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Measuring rater bias in diagnostic tests with ordinal ratings.

Authors:  Chanmin Kim; Xiaoyan Lin; Kerrie P Nelson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Patient facing decision support system for interpretation of laboratory test results.

Authors:  Georgy Kopanitsa; Ilia Semenov
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Analysis and Comparison of Early Childhood Nutritional Outcomes Among Offspring of Chinese Women Under the Chinese 2021 and US 2009 Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines.

Authors:  Fangfang Chen; Peng Wang; Jing Wang; Zijun Liao; Xinnan Zong; Yiren Chen; Jianqiang Lai; Ting Zhang; Gongshu Liu; Xianghui Xie
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  A comparative study of standardized quantitative and visual assessment for predicting tumor volume and outcome in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma staged with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Lars C Gormsen; Mikkel H Vendelbo; Mette Abildgaard Pedersen; Ate Haraldsen; Karin Hjorthaug; Trond Velde Bogsrud; Lars J Petersen; Karen Juul Jensen; Rasmus Brøndum; Tarec C El-Galaly
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.