OBJECTIVES: To appraise the impact of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) on angiographic and clinical endpoints in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute PE and hemodynamic compromise, based mainly on anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies, is challenging and still suboptimal in many patients. In such a setting, mechanical removal of thrombus from pulmonary circulation holds the promise of significant clinical benefits, albeit remains under debate. METHODS: We retrospectively report on 51 patients referred to our catheterization laboratory and treated with AngioJet RT. Patients were classified according to the degree of hemodynamic compromise (shock, hypotension, and right ventricular dysfunction) to explore thoroughly the degree of angiographic pulmonary involvement (angiographic massive PE was defined as the presence of a Miller index >or= 17) and the impact on angiographic (obstruction, perfusion, and Miller indexes) and clinical (all-cause death, recurrence of PE, bleeding, renal failure, and severe thrombocytopenia) endpoints of AngioJet RT. RESULTS: Angiographic massive PE was present in all patients with shock, whereas patients with right ventricular dysfunction and hypotension showed a similar substantial pulmonary vascular bed involvement. Technical success was obtained in 92.2% of patients, with a significant improvement in obstruction, perfusion and Miller indexes in each subgroup (all P < 0.0001). Four patients reported major bleedings and eight (15.7%) died in-hospital. Laboratory experience was significantly associated to a lower rate of major bleedings. All survivors were alive at long-term follow-up (35.5 +/- 21.7 months) except three who expired due to cancer and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands AngioJet RT can be operated safely and effectively in most patients with acute PE, either massive or submassive, and substantial involvement of pulmonary vascular bed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
OBJECTIVES: To appraise the impact of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) on angiographic and clinical endpoints in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute PE and hemodynamic compromise, based mainly on anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies, is challenging and still suboptimal in many patients. In such a setting, mechanical removal of thrombus from pulmonary circulation holds the promise of significant clinical benefits, albeit remains under debate. METHODS: We retrospectively report on 51 patients referred to our catheterization laboratory and treated with AngioJet RT. Patients were classified according to the degree of hemodynamic compromise (shock, hypotension, and right ventricular dysfunction) to explore thoroughly the degree of angiographic pulmonary involvement (angiographic massive PE was defined as the presence of a Miller index >or= 17) and the impact on angiographic (obstruction, perfusion, and Miller indexes) and clinical (all-cause death, recurrence of PE, bleeding, renal failure, and severe thrombocytopenia) endpoints of AngioJet RT. RESULTS: Angiographic massive PE was present in all patients with shock, whereas patients with right ventricular dysfunction and hypotension showed a similar substantial pulmonary vascular bed involvement. Technical success was obtained in 92.2% of patients, with a significant improvement in obstruction, perfusion and Miller indexes in each subgroup (all P < 0.0001). Four patients reported major bleedings and eight (15.7%) died in-hospital. Laboratory experience was significantly associated to a lower rate of major bleedings. All survivors were alive at long-term follow-up (35.5 +/- 21.7 months) except three who expired due to cancer and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands AngioJet RT can be operated safely and effectively in most patients with acute PE, either massive or submassive, and substantial involvement of pulmonary vascular bed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Basar Sareyyupoglu; Kevin L Greason; Rakesh M Suri; Mark T Keegan; Joseph A Dearani; Thoralf M Sundt Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Israel M Barbash; William H Schenke; Majdi Halabi; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Anthony Z Faranesh; Ozgur Kocaturk; Robert J Lederman Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.464