Literature DB >> 19235018

Remembering the past and imagining the future: differences in event specificity of spontaneously generated thought.

Rachel J Anderson1, Stephen A Dewhurst.   

Abstract

A growing interest has emerged in the role that autobiographical memory retrieval plays in simulation of future events. Cognitive explorations in this domain have generally relied on cue word paradigms with instructions to develop specific (relating to one particular day) memories or future events. However, the usefulness of this paradigm has been questioned with respect to its ability to assess habitual patterns of retrieval within autobiographical memory. The current study investigated similarities and differences in how participants spontaneously remember the past and imagine the future when the specificity constraints inherent in the cue word task are removed. A total of 93 undergraduate students completed two sentence-completion tasks, probing for past and future events. A number of differences emerged between past and future thought; in particular, they were less specific when simulating future events compared with past events. This reduction in specificity was the result of participants producing more future thoughts relating to extended lifetime periods and semantic associates. The findings are discussed in relation to the underlying cognitive processes involved in autobiographical memory retrieval and future event simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235018     DOI: 10.1080/09658210902751669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  12 in total

1.  Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm.

Authors:  Scott N Cole; Søren R Staugaard; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  Afterlife future thinking: imagining oneself beyond death.

Authors:  Worawach Tungjitcharoen; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 3.  The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Demis Hassabis; Victoria C Martin; R Nathan Spreng; Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Chinese and Australians showed difference in mental time travel in emotion and content but not specificity.

Authors:  Xing-Jie Chen; Lu-Lu Liu; Ji-Fang Cui; Ya Wang; David H K Shum; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-26

5.  Episodic memory and episodic future thinking impairments in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: an underlying difficulty with scene construction or self-projection?

Authors:  Sophie E Lind; David M Williams; Dermot M Bowler; Anna Peel
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Autobiographical Memory and Future Thinking Specificity and Content in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Stella R Quenstedt; Jillian N Sucher; Kendall A Pfeffer; Roland Hart; Adam D Brown
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 7.  Spontaneous and deliberate future thinking: a dual process account.

Authors:  Scott Cole; Lia Kvavilashvili
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-12-05

8.  Episodic memory: a comparative approach.

Authors:  Gema Martin-Ordas; Josep Call
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  Production of Verb Tense in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Meta-Analysis and Further Data.

Authors:  Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah; Laura Friedman
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Show Reduced Specificity and Less Positive Events in Mental Time Travel.

Authors:  Xing-Jie Chen; Lu-Lu Liu; Ji-Fang Cui; Ya Wang; An-Tao Chen; Feng-Hua Li; Wei-Hong Wang; Han-Feng Zheng; Ming-Yuan Gan; Chun-Qiu Li; David H K Shum; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.