Literature DB >> 19234068

Stimulus-response profile during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to the primary motor cortex.

Takashi Hanakawa1, Tatsuya Mima, Riki Matsumoto, Mitsunari Abe, Morito Inouchi, Shin-Ichi Urayama, Kimitaka Anami, Manabu Honda, Hidenao Fukuyama.   

Abstract

We examined the stimulus-response profile during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) with electromyographic monitoring and hemodynamic responses with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 3 Tesla. In 16 healthy subjects, single TMS pulses were irregularly delivered to the left primary motor cortex at a mean frequency of 0.15 Hz with a wide range of stimulus intensities. The measurement of MEP proved a typical relationship between stimulus intensity and MEP amplitude in the concurrent TMS-fMRI environment. In the population-level analysis of the suprathreshold stimulation conditions, significant increases in hemodynamic responses were detected in the motor/somatosensory network, reflecting both direct and remote effects of TMS, and also the auditory/cognitive areas, perhaps related to detection of clicks. The stimulus-response profile showed both linear and nonlinear components in the direct and remote motor/somatosensory network. A detailed analysis suggested that the nonlinear components of the motor/somatosensory network activity might be induced by nonlinear recruitment of neurons in addition to sensory afferents resulting from movement. These findings expand our basic knowledge of the quantitative relationship between TMS-induced neural activations and hemodynamic signals measured by neuroimaging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19234068     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  26 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the brain's intrinsic activity in a frequency-dependent manner.

Authors:  Mark C Eldaief; Mark A Halko; Randy L Buckner; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A muscle-activity-dependent gain between motor cortex and EMG.

Authors:  Stephanie Naufel; Joshua I Glaser; Konrad P Kording; Eric J Perreault; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Water diffusion reveals networks that modulate multiregional morphological plasticity after repetitive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Mitsunari Abe; Hidenao Fukuyama; Tatsuya Mima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Brenton Hordacre; Bahar Moezzi; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Probing thalamic integrity in schizophrenia using concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yelena Guller; Fabio Ferrarelli; Alexander J Shackman; Simone Sarasso; Michael J Peterson; Frederick J Langheim; Mary E Meyerand; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07

7.  Single pulse TMS to the DLPFC, compared to a matched sham control, induces a direct, causal increase in caudate, cingulate, and thalamic BOLD signal.

Authors:  Logan T Dowdle; Truman R Brown; Mark S George; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  EPI distortion correction for concurrent human brain stimulation and imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Hyuntaek Oh; Jung Hwan Kim; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Static field influences on transcranial magnetic stimulation: considerations for TMS in the scanner environment.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Reza Jalinous; Gabriela L Cantarero; John E Desmond
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Efficient and robust identification of cortical targets in concurrent TMS-fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Jun Hua; Diana A Liao; John E Desmond
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.