Literature DB >> 19233783

Behavior and milk production of buffalo cows as affected by housing system.

G De Rosa1, F Grasso, A Braghieri, A Bilancione, A Di Francia, F Napolitano.   

Abstract

To verify the effect of 2 housing systems (with and without a pool and an ample outdoor lot) on behavior and milk yield, 45 lactating buffalo cows were group-housed in a free stall open-sided barn with concrete floor where they received 10 m(2)/head as space allowance (group NP); 43 cows were group-housed in a similar barn, but had access to an outdoor yard (36 m(2)/head) and a concrete pool of 208 m(2) (group WP). Animals were subjected to 8 sessions of instantaneous scan sampling at approximately 10-d intervals. Behavioral variables were expressed as proportions of subjects observed in each category of posture and activity. In addition, rapid behaviors such as agonistic, social, and reproductive interactions, social licking, and self-grooming were recorded continuously. These variables were expressed as number of interactions per animal. At the end of each hour of observation, temperature and relative humidity were recorded. In WP the proportion of animals observed wallowing was 0.476 +/- 0.034, whereas lower proportions were observed standing (0.389 +/- 0.029) or lying (0.141 +/- 0.021) outside the pool. In NP the proportions of animals observed standing and lying were 0.452 +/- 0.042 and 0.548 +/- 0.042, respectively. A significant relationship between mean temperatures recorded on observation days and proportion of animals in the pool was observed (r(s) = 0.41). Fewer animals from group WP were observed idling compared with buffaloes from group NP (0.44 +/- 0.024 vs. 0.509 +/- 0.024, respectively), whereas more WP animals were involved in investigative activities than NP cows (0.099 +/- 0.009 vs. 0.042 +/- 0.009, respectively). A greater number of social interactions (sniffing and nuzzling) and social lickings were observed in group WP than in group NP (0.120 +/- 0.010 vs. 0.067 +/- 0.010, and 0.151 +/- 0.018 vs. 0.090 +/- 0.018, respectively). The WP buffalo cows had a greater milk yield than NP cows (11.73 +/- 0.31 vs. 10.78 +/- 0.28 kg/d, respectively), whereas no differences between groups were observed for protein (4.86 +/- 0.04 vs. 4.80 +/- 0.03% for WP and NP, respectively) and fat contents (8.49 +/- 0.14 vs. 8.38 +/- 0.13% for WP and NP, respectively). We conclude that the provision of a pool and an ample outdoor paddock can have beneficial effects on welfare and milk production of buffaloes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19233783     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Effects of Sprinkler Flow Rate on Physiological, Behavioral and Production Responses of Nili Ravi Buffaloes during Subtropical Summer.

Authors:  Musa Bah; Muhammad Afzal Rashid; Khalid Javed; Talat Naseer Pasha; Muhammad Qamer Shahid
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Handling and Physiological Aspects of the Dual-Purpose Water Buffalo Production System in the Mexican Humid Tropics.

Authors:  Daniela Rodríguez-González; Antonio Humberto Hamad Minervino; Agustín Orihuela; Aldo Bertoni; Diego Armando Morales-Canela; Adolfo Álvarez-Macías; Nancy José-Pérez; Adriana Domínguez-Oliva; Daniel Mota-Rojas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Space allowance: a tool for improving behavior, milk and meat production, and reproduction performance of buffalo in different housing systems-a review.

Authors:  Mohamed I El Sabry; Obaida Almasri
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 1.893

Review 4.  Neurophysiology of Milk Ejection and Prestimulation in Dairy Buffaloes.

Authors:  Fabio Napolitano; Ada Braghieri; Andrea Bragaglio; Daniela Rodríguez-González; Patricia Mora-Medina; Marcelo Daniel Ghezzi; Adolfo Álvarez-Macías; Pamela Anahí Lendez; Emilio Sabia; Adriana Domínguez-Oliva; Joseline Jacome-Romero; Daniel Mota-Rojas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Metagenomics analysis revealed the distinctive ruminal microbiome and resistive profiles in dairy buffaloes.

Authors:  Hui-Zeng Sun; Ke-Lan Peng; Ming-Yuan Xue; Jian-Xin Liu
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Purification of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins from late-pregnancy Bubalus bubalis placentas and development of a radioimmunoassay for pregnancy diagnosis in water buffalo females.

Authors:  Olimpia Barbato; Noelita Melo de Sousa; Vittoria Lucia Barile; Claudio Canali; Jean-François Beckers
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?

Authors:  Silvana Mattiello; Monica Battini; Giuseppe De Rosa; Fabio Napolitano; Cathy Dwyer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Mother-Young Bonding in Buffalo and Other Farm Animals.

Authors:  Agustín Orihuela; Daniel Mota-Rojas; Ana Strappini; Francesco Serrapica; Ada Braghieri; Patricia Mora-Medina; Fabio Napolitano
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.