OBJECTIVE: Patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) often develop common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms. We wished to assess the natural history of the CIA in the presence of an AAA and develop a model to predict CIA growth. METHODS: Data were gathered at a single center from 1996 to 2006 in patients undergoing AAA surveillance. Maximum size of AAA and both CIAs at yearly intervals were collected. CIA > 16 mm was defined as being an aneurysm. A mixed effects regression model was generated to predict CIA growth rates. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with AAA underwent duplex ultrasound on at least two occasions (median, 4; range, 2-11). Average baseline CIA was 12 mm (standard deviation, 5.0); 41% of patients had one CIA over 16 mm. A CIA > 16 mm was more likely to expand (81% vs 53%, P = .0001) particularly in patients with an AAA that expanded (73% vs 43%, P = .0005). A larger AAA was associated with a larger CIA (P = .0341). CIA growth rate was proportional to baseline size. A CIA of 16 mm was predicted to take 10 years to reach 25 mm (156% or 5.6% per annum) or if 23 mm at baseline 10 years to reach 35 mm (152% or 5.2% per annum). Overall, a CIA was predicted to increase in diameter by 5.7% (+/- 0.5%) per annum. CONCLUSION: The CIA in the presence of an AAA expands over time. CIA > 16 mm are more likely to increase. Routine duplex examination of a CIA less than 16 mm may not be necessary when following up AAA. These data may be used to aid planning and intervention during AAA repair.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) often develop common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms. We wished to assess the natural history of the CIA in the presence of an AAA and develop a model to predict CIA growth. METHODS: Data were gathered at a single center from 1996 to 2006 in patients undergoing AAA surveillance. Maximum size of AAA and both CIAs at yearly intervals were collected. CIA > 16 mm was defined as being an aneurysm. A mixed effects regression model was generated to predict CIA growth rates. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with AAA underwent duplex ultrasound on at least two occasions (median, 4; range, 2-11). Average baseline CIA was 12 mm (standard deviation, 5.0); 41% of patients had one CIA over 16 mm. A CIA > 16 mm was more likely to expand (81% vs 53%, P = .0001) particularly in patients with an AAA that expanded (73% vs 43%, P = .0005). A larger AAA was associated with a larger CIA (P = .0341). CIA growth rate was proportional to baseline size. A CIA of 16 mm was predicted to take 10 years to reach 25 mm (156% or 5.6% per annum) or if 23 mm at baseline 10 years to reach 35 mm (152% or 5.2% per annum). Overall, a CIA was predicted to increase in diameter by 5.7% (+/- 0.5%) per annum. CONCLUSION: The CIA in the presence of an AAA expands over time. CIA > 16 mm are more likely to increase. Routine duplex examination of a CIA less than 16 mm may not be necessary when following up AAA. These data may be used to aid planning and intervention during AAA repair.
Authors: Matthew Chapman; Leslie E Quint; Kuanwong Watcharotone; Bin Nan; Michael J Ranella; Mariana R DeFreitas; Joanna R Hider; Jonathan L Eliason; Himanshu J Patel Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Alexander Dierks; Alexander Sauer; Franziska Wolfschmidt; Nicole Hassold; Richard Kellersmann; Thorsten A Bley; Ralph Kickuth Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Bongyeon Sohn; Hak Ju Kim; Hyoung Woo Chang; Jae Hang Lee; Dong Jung Kim; Jun Sung Kim; Cheong Lim; Kay Hyun Park Journal: Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-12-05
Authors: Benoit Desjardins; Karin E Dill; Scott D Flamm; Christopher J Francois; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Sanjeeva P Kalva; M Ashraf Mansour; Emile R Mohler; Isabel B Oliva; Matthew P Schenker; Clifford Weiss; Frank J Rybicki Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-05-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Derek Klarin; Shefali Setia Verma; Renae Judy; Ozan Dikilitas; Brooke N Wolford; Ishan Paranjpe; Michael G Levin; Cuiping Pan; Catherine Tcheandjieu; Joshua M Spin; Julie Lynch; Themistocles L Assimes; Linn Åldstedt Nyrønning; Erney Mattsson; Todd L Edwards; Josh Denny; Eric Larson; Ming Ta Michael Lee; David Carrell; Yanfei Zhang; Gail P Jarvik; Ali G Gharavi; John Harley; Frank Mentch; Jennifer A Pacheco; Hakon Hakonarson; Anne Heidi Skogholt; Laurent Thomas; Maiken Elvestad Gabrielsen; Kristian Hveem; Jonas Bille Nielsen; Wei Zhou; Lars Fritsche; Jie Huang; Pradeep Natarajan; Yan V Sun; Scott L DuVall; Daniel J Rader; Kelly Cho; Kyong-Mi Chang; Peter W F Wilson; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sekar Kathiresan; Salvatore T Scali; Scott A Berceli; Cristen Willer; Gregory T Jones; Matthew J Bown; Girish Nadkarni; Iftikhar J Kullo; Marylyn Ritchie; Scott M Damrauer; Philip S Tsao Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 29.690