Literature DB >> 19233590

Ultrasound velocity criteria for renal in-stent restenosis.

Yung-Wei Chi1, Christopher J White, Stanley Thornton, Richard V Milani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stent placement is a recognized treatment for patients with hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis when medical therapy fails. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is the primary method used for noninvasive assessment of renal artery patency. Arterial stents alter the compliance of the artery, which could make the standard reference values, based on native renal artery velocities, inaccurate. This study attempted to determine DUS criteria for renal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR).
METHODS: We studied 67 consecutive patients with suspected renal artery ISR based on abnormal renal DUS results, defined as peak systolic velocity (PSV) >or=200 cm/s and renal/aortic velocity ratio (RAR) >or=3.5. The ISR patients were compared with 55 consecutive nonstented patients who underwent renal DUS evaluation and renal angiography. Those with >or=50% angiographic narrowing in each group were analyzed, and renal PSV and RAR were compared.
RESULTS: In the 67 patients with renal stents and 55 patients without renal stents, a statistically significant correlation was found for both PSV and RAR in detecting renal ISR and renal artery stenosis as defined by quantitative angiography (P = .02). For any level of angiographic stenosis >or=50%, the ISR group had relatively higher PSV and RAR compared with the nonstented group. Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that PSV >or=395 cm/s or RAR >or=5.1 were the most predictive of angiographically significant ISR >or=70%.
CONCLUSION: The current DUS criteria for native renal arteries may overestimate the degree of angiographic ISR due to changes in compliance. We recommend that DUS laboratories make adjustments in PSV and RAR obtained by DUS when monitoring the patency of renal stents for ISR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19233590     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  10 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic criteria for renovascular disease: where are we now?

Authors:  Sandra M S Herrmann; Stephen C Textor
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Differences in GFR and Tissue Oxygenation, and Interactions between Stenotic and Contralateral Kidneys in Unilateral Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease.

Authors:  Sandra M S Herrmann; Ahmed Saad; Alfonso Eirin; John Woollard; Hui Tang; Michael A McKusick; Sanjay Misra; James F Glockner; Lilach O Lerman; Stephen C Textor
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging identifies cortical hypoxia in severe renovascular disease.

Authors:  Monika L Gloviczki; James F Glockner; John A Crane; Michael A McKusick; Sanjay Misra; Joseph P Grande; Lilach O Lerman; Stephen C Textor
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  How should we define appropriate patients for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty treatment?

Authors:  Yoshio Iwashima; Toshihiko Ishimitsu
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Clinical effectiveness of secondary interventions for restenosis after renal artery stenting.

Authors:  Thomas A Simone; Benjamin S Brooke; Philip P Goodney; Daniel B Walsh; David H Stone; Richard J Powell; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Current Concepts in the Treatment of Renovascular Hypertension.

Authors:  Sandra M Herrmann; Stephen C Textor
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 7.  Endovascular Management of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Post-Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions Era Winner or False Alarm?

Authors:  Evridiki Karanikola; Georgios Karaolanis; George Galyfos; Emmanuel Barbaressos; Viktoria Palla; Konstantinos Filis
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2017-03-31

8. 

Authors:  Rodrigo Gibin Jaldin; Marcone Lima Sobreira; Regina Moura; Matheus Bertanha; Rafael Elias Fares Pimenta; Ricardo de Alvarenga Yoshida; Jamil Victor de Oliveira Mariúba; Winston Bonetti Yoshida
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

9.  The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound versus Doppler Ultrasound in Grading Renal Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Yanhua Cui; Quanbin Zhang; Jiping Yan; Ji Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis.

Authors:  W Schäberle; L Leyerer; W Schierling; K Pfister
Journal:  Gefasschirurgie       Date:  2015-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.