Literature DB >> 19233419

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience.

Ugur Boylu1, Mathew Oommen, Benjamin R Lee, Raju Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the surgical outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in patients presenting with anterior crossing vessels with and without transposition of the crossing vessel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Evaluation of surgical success was based on validated pain scores, diuretic renography and imaging results, including excretory urography, computerized tomography or ultrasound.
RESULTS: Anterior crossing vessels were identified in 48 patients (44.9%) and vessels were transposed in 18 (37.5%) (group 1). No transposition was performed in 30 patients (62.5%) (group 2). Mean radiological followup was 52.9 weeks in group 1 and 65.3 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.181). Mean pain score on a scale of 10 was 0.82 in group 1 and 0.74 in group 2 (p = 0.917). A Whitaker test performed in 3 patients with persistent pain was negative. Preoperatively mean differential function on the affected side was 35.1% in group 1 and 36.9% in group 2 (p = 0.133). Half-time was calculated as a mean of 46.3 minutes in group 1 and 49.4 minutes in group 2 (p = 0.541). In groups 1 and 2 mean postoperative differential function improved to 41.1% and 40.9%, and mean half-time improved to 7.43 and 8.03 minutes, respectively (p = 0.491). A comparison of preoperative and postoperative differential function, and half-time in each group showed a statistically significant difference. The radiographic and symptomatic success rate was 100% with no open conversion and recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty outcomes revealed similar success rates in terms of the change in symptoms and renal function in patients with or without anterior crossing vessel transposition. Transposition of crossing vessel should only be performed when the anatomical relation dictates and it should be an intraoperative decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19233419     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  [Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty].

Authors:  H Y Zhao; X J Ye; W N Chen; L Z An; J Liu; L L Xiong; X B Huang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Rishi Nayyar; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Laparoscopic modified bypass pyeloplasty: a simple procedure for straightforward ureteral spatulation and intracorporeal suturing.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Yuichi Sato; Soichiro Ogawa; Michihiro Yabe; Hidenori Akaihata; Junya Hata; Kei Ishibashi; Kentaro Mizuno; Yutaro Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: vascular anatomic variations and implication for surgical approaches.

Authors:  Frédéric Panthier; Fabien Lareyre; Marie Audouin; Juliette Raffort
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Differences between intrinsic and extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: histology and functional analyses.

Authors:  V Ellerkamp; R R Kurth; E Schmid; S Zundel; S W Warmann; J Fuchs
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Crossing vessels with suspension versus transposition in laparoscopic pyeloplasty of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Jingjun Zhang; Weinan Chen; Liulin Xiong; Xiaobo Huang; Xiongjun Ye
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with cephalad translocation of the crossing vessel - a new approach to the Hellström technique.

Authors:  Tomasz Szydelko; Wojciech Apoznanski; Piotr Koleda; Leslaw Rusiecki; Dariusz Janczak
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul Janak Sinha; Dheeraj Kumar Gupta; Vikas Kumar; Mohit Pandey; Asif Akhtar
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty.

Authors:  David D Thiel
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-10-30

10.  The long-term results of laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty in adults.

Authors:  Mohamed M Gargouri; Yassine Nouira; Yousri Kallel; Ahmed Sellami; Rami Boulma; Chlif Mohamed; Sami Ben Rhouma
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2013-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.