Literature DB >> 19233352

Results of non-operative treatment following hip fracture compared to surgical intervention.

M Hossain1, V Neelapala, J G Andrew.   

Abstract

We followed all consecutive hip fracture patients admitted between 2004 and 2006, identified cases in which the intention was to treat non-operative and compared their functional outcome and mortality with a similar cohort treated surgically over the same period. We recorded length of hospital stay, place of discharge, pre and post-fracture mobility and residence, 30 days and 1 year mortality, re-admission due to same fracture and delayed surgery. The group treated surgically was recruited and matched for age, gender, pre and post-fracture mobility, mental confusion and independence. 25 patients were treated non-operative. 22 patients treated surgically over the same time period matched the patient characteristics of the non-operative arm. The mean hospital stay was 13 days in both groups. There were 4 extra-capsular fractures (3 displaced) and 21 intra-capsular fractures (5 displaced) in the non-operative arm and 11 extra-capsular fractures and 9 intra-capsular fractures in the surgically treated arm. 4 patients from the non-operative treatment group underwent late surgery because of persisting hip pain 20 days-2 months after the index event (2 cannulated screws, 1 hemiarthroplasty, 1 total hip arthroplasty). 11 patients in the surgical treatment arm underwent dynamic screw fixation, 1 had cannulated screw, 1 had total hip replacement and 7 had hemiarthroplasty. 14 of the non-operative treated patients were mobile independently or with aid before fracture but only 9 patients retained their pre-fracture mobility following treatment, compared to 16 patients pre-fracture and 11 patients post-fracture after surgery. 16 patients treated non-operative were living independently prior to injury but only 7 went back to their own residence. Of the operatively treated patients 14 patients were living independently and 10 patients went back to their previous residence. 1 month and 1 year mortality in the non-operative treated group was 4/21 and 7/21 respectively compared to 1/20 and 5/20 in the operative fixation group. There was no statistically significant difference in mobility, residence or mortality between the two groups (Fisher exact test, p>0.05). Non-operative management after hip fracture is suitable for medically unfit patients and does not result in statistically significant difference in functional outcome or mortality compared to patients treated surgically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19233352     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  15 in total

1.  Assessing preoperative frailty utilizing validated geriatric mortality calculators and their association with postoperative hip fracture mortality risk.

Authors:  Jennifer G Dwyer; Jason F Reynoso; Georgia A Seevers; Kendra K Schmid; Padmashri Muralidhar; Beau Konigsberg; Thomas G Lynch; Jason M Johanning
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

2.  Decision making and outcomes of a hospice patient hospitalized with a hip fracture.

Authors:  Natalie E Leland; Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Julie Bynum; Vince Mor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Analysis of the effects of a delay of surgery in patients with hip fractures: outcome and causes.

Authors:  S Lieten; A Herrtwich; B Bravenboer; T Scheerlinck; S Van Laere; J Vanlauwe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Prevention and clinical management of hip fractures in patients with dementia.

Authors:  Isaura B Menzies; Daniel A Mendelson; Stephen L Kates; Susan M Friedman
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2010-11

5.  Hip fractures in the elderly: operative versus nonoperative management.

Authors:  Eileen Tay
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Poor prognosis in elderly patients who refused surgery because of economic burden and medical problem after hip fracture.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Ji-Hoon Baek; Min Kyu Kim; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Factors associated with mortality among elderly people hospitalized due to femoral fractures.

Authors:  Léo Graciolli Franco; Amanda Loffi Kindermann; Lucas Tramujas; Kelser de Souza Kock
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-08-17

8.  Operationalising a conceptual framework for a contiguous hospitalisation episode to study associations between surgical timing and death after first hip fracture: a Canadian observational study.

Authors:  Katie Jane Sheehan; Adrian R Levy; Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Michael Tang; Lisa Kuramoto; Jason M Sutherland; Lauren Beaupre; Suzanne N Morin; Edward Harvey; Nick Bradley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Surgery for hip fracture yields societal benefits that exceed the direct medical costs.

Authors:  Qian Gu; Lane Koenig; Richard C Mather; John Tongue
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Implant-Related Complications and Mortality After Use of Short or Long Gamma Nail for Intertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Study with Minimum 13-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Nolan S Horner; Kristian Samuelsson; Janos Solyom; Kristian Bjørgul; Olufemi R Ayeni; Bengt Östman
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2017-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.