BACKGROUND & AIMS: Variants in the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) gene are associated with impaired metabolism of celecoxib. We examined the influence of CYP2C9*2 (R144C) and CYP2C9*3 (I359L) variants on dose-related response or toxicity in a randomized trial of celecoxib. METHODS: We identified individuals with CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 genotypes (>or=1 variant allele) in the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib trial. Following adenoma removal, patients were assigned randomly to groups given placebo or low-dose (200 mg twice daily) or high-dose (400 mg twice daily) celecoxib and underwent follow-up colonoscopies at 1 and/or 3 years. RESULTS: Among 1660 patients, 21% were CYP2C9*2, and 12% were CYP2C9*3 genotypes. Overall, celecoxib was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in adenoma, compared with placebo, with relative risks (RR) of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.76) for the low-dose and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.46-0.63) for the high-dose groups. However, the additional protective effect of the high dose, compared with the low-dose, was observed only in those with CYP2C9*3 genotypes (RR, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.87). The high dose, compared with low dose, was not associated with significant risk reduction among those with CYP2C9*2 (RR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.57-1.21) or wild-type (RR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.72-1.11) genotypes. Compared with placebo, a higher incidence of cardiovascular events was associated with both doses among patients with wild-type genotypes but only with the high dose among patients with variant genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The greater efficacy of high-dose celecoxib, compared with the low-dose, in preventing colorectal adenoma appears confined to individuals with slow metabolizer (CYP2C9*3) genotypes. Genetic variability influences susceptibility to the potential benefits and hazards of celecoxib.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Variants in the cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) gene are associated with impaired metabolism of celecoxib. We examined the influence of CYP2C9*2 (R144C) and CYP2C9*3 (I359L) variants on dose-related response or toxicity in a randomized trial of celecoxib. METHODS: We identified individuals with CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 genotypes (>or=1 variant allele) in the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib trial. Following adenoma removal, patients were assigned randomly to groups given placebo or low-dose (200 mg twice daily) or high-dose (400 mg twice daily) celecoxib and underwent follow-up colonoscopies at 1 and/or 3 years. RESULTS: Among 1660 patients, 21% were CYP2C9*2, and 12% were CYP2C9*3 genotypes. Overall, celecoxib was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in adenoma, compared with placebo, with relative risks (RR) of 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.76) for the low-dose and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.46-0.63) for the high-dose groups. However, the additional protective effect of the high dose, compared with the low-dose, was observed only in those with CYP2C9*3 genotypes (RR, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.87). The high dose, compared with low dose, was not associated with significant risk reduction among those with CYP2C9*2 (RR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.57-1.21) or wild-type (RR, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.72-1.11) genotypes. Compared with placebo, a higher incidence of cardiovascular events was associated with both doses among patients with wild-type genotypes but only with the high dose among patients with variant genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The greater efficacy of high-dose celecoxib, compared with the low-dose, in preventing colorectal adenoma appears confined to individuals with slow metabolizer (CYP2C9*3) genotypes. Genetic variability influences susceptibility to the potential benefits and hazards of celecoxib.
Authors: Melissa A Kramer; Allan E Rettie; Mark J Rieder; Erwin T Cabacungan; Ronald N Hines Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2008-02-29 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: U Ruth Michaelis; John R Falck; Ronald Schmidt; Rudi Busse; Ingrid Fleming Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Mitchell K Higashi; David L Veenstra; L Midori Kondo; Ann K Wittkowsky; Sengkeo L Srinouanprachanh; Fred M Farin; Allan E Rettie Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew T Chan; Camelia S Sima; Ann G Zauber; Paul M Ridker; Ernest T Hawk; Monica M Bertagnolli Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2011-08
Authors: Li Gong; Caroline F Thorn; Monica M Bertagnolli; Tilo Grosser; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Derek Van Booven; Sharon Marsh; Howard McLeod; Michelle Whirl Carrillo; Katrin Sangkuhl; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Kathryn A Gold; Edward S Kim; Diane D Liu; Ping Yuan; Carmen Behrens; Luisa M Solis; Humam Kadara; David C Rice; Ignacio I Wistuba; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter; J Jack Lee; Waun K Hong Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 12.531