Literature DB >> 19232852

Comparison of methods for extraction of viral DNA from cellular specimens.

Linda Cook1, Ederlyn E Atienza, Arthur Bagabag, Rose M Obrigewitch, Keith R Jerome.   

Abstract

The accuracy and precision of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results depend not only on the PCR reaction but also on the extraction of viral nucleic acid. Although the extraction of viral nucleic acid from fluids has been extensively studied, less data are available regarding extractions from cellular specimens. We therefore evaluated several commercially available kits for the extraction of nucleic acid from cellular specimens. Although the kits generally performed well, there were some differences in extraction efficiency, especially at low numbers of input cells. Inclusion of a multivirus positive control allowed careful monitoring of extraction efficiency during routine clinical use. Laboratories are encouraged to validate extraction methods carefully in the context of the proposed viral testing.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232852     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  3 in total

Review 1.  Roseomics: a blank slate.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Moorman; Eain A Murphy
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 2.  Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Weihua Tang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Viral diagnostics in the era of digital polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Ruth Hall Sedlak; Keith R Jerome
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.803

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.