Literature DB >> 19232689

Prospective assessment of malnutrition in urologic patients.

Alexander Karl1, Peter Rittler, Alexander Buchner, Vincent Fradet, Robert Speer, Sebastian Walther, G Christian Stief.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The association between malnutrition and poor patient outcome has been established for different medical fields. There is a general lack of data on the prevalence of malnutrition in urologic patients. An assessment of malnutrition is needed to raise awareness of this condition and to initiate nutrition therapy if needed.
METHODS: The nutritional state of 897 patients was assessed prospectively using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS) at a urologic department. Recruitment started in January 2007 and closed in July 2007. Of the 897 patients, 751 were men (84%) and 146 (16%) were women. The median age was 66 years (range 18-98). Of the 897 patients, 441 presented with benign disease and 456 with malignant disease.
RESULTS: A severe risk of malnutrition was diagnosed in 144 patients (16%; NRS score >or=3). The NRS score was 0, 1-2, and 3-5 in 45, 708, and 144 patients, respectively. Age and malignant disease were significant risk factors for malnutrition (P < .001). Also, the type of surgery was significantly associated with the risk of malnutrition (P < .001). Sex and body mass index had no significant influence. Of the patients with an NRS score of >or=3, 94% presented with >or=1 of the 3 risk factors: older age, open surgery, and/or malignant disease (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, 16% of urologic patients were at a severe risk of malnutrition according to the NRS 2002. Older age, type of procedure, and malignant disease proved to be significant factors for a greater risk of malnutrition. Adequate nutritional supportive therapy should be considered in these patients to optimize their clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232689     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

1.  Effect of preoperative nutritional deficiency on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Justin R Gregg; Michael S Cookson; Sharon Phillips; Shady Salem; Sam S Chang; Peter E Clark; Rodney Davis; C J Stimson; Monty Aghazadeh; Joseph A Smith; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) in robotic cystectomy surgery. Review of current status and trends.

Authors:  Christofer Adding; Justin W Collins; Oscar Laurin; Abolfazl Hosseini; N Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Emerging Impact of Malnutrition on Surgical Patients: Literature Review and Potential Implications for Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Conrad M Tobert; Jill M Hamilton-Reeves; Lyse A Norian; Chermaine Hung; Nathan A Brooks; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Tracy M Downs; Douglas P Robertson; Ruth Grossman; Kenneth G Nepple
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Comorbidity and nutritional indices as predictors of morbidity after transurethral procedures: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Massimo Valerio; Yannick Cerantola; Urs Fritschi; Martin Hubner; Katia Iglesias; Anne-Sophie Legris; Ilaria Lucca; Yannis Vlamopoulos; Laurent Vaucher; Patrice Jichlinski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Preoperative nutritional status is an important predictor of survival in patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Todd M Morgan; Dominic Tang; Kelly L Stratton; Daniel A Barocas; Christopher B Anderson; Justin R Gregg; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs.

Authors:  Raed A Azhar; Bernard Bochner; James Catto; Alvin C Goh; John Kelly; Hiten D Patel; Raj S Pruthi; George N Thalmann; Mihir Desai
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Nutrition risk and assessment process in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Carrie Michel; Hilary L Robertson; Juliana Camargo; Jill M Hamilton-Reeves
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Nutritional predictors of complications following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  David C Johnson; Stephen B Riggs; Matthew E Nielsen; Jonathan E Matthews; Michael E Woods; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi; Angela B Smith
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.