Literature DB >> 1923207

Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.

M M Silver1, P Miles, C Rosa.   

Abstract

A randomized study compared the Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments with respect to quality of the biopsy obtained and pain related to the procedure. Fifty-five subjects were randomized to one of two groups. Twenty-six women had a biopsy using the Pipelle, followed immediately by one using the Novak instrument; 29 had the procedures performed in the reverse sequence. After the procedures, each woman completed a pain questionnaire. Individual histology slides were reviewed in a blinded fashion. The two biopsies from each subject were paired, and a reviewer indicated the preferred type of biopsy. The scores were analyzed by nonparametric tests. The instruments yielded biopsies of similar quality (z = -0.18, P = .856). Pain scores were lower for the Pipelle (z = -3.40, P = .001). The pathologist showed no preference when choosing Novak or Pipelle slides (chi 2 = 2.08, P = .149). In our patient population, the Pipelle instrument was comparable to the Novak instrument in obtaining adequate tissue and was significantly less painful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1923207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood; J Kleijnen; H Kitchener; P Martin-Hirsch; L Nelson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy. Larger and more robust studies are needed.

Authors:  J C Hardwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

3.  Endometrial sampling and general practice.

Authors:  M Shapley; C W Redman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Endometrial sampling in low-risk patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Brenda F Narice; Brigitte Delaney; Jon M Dickson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Diagnostic Values of Pipelle and Standard Curettage Compared to Hysterectomy Pathology in Postmenopausal Bleeding: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Fariba Behnamfar; Elham Arshad
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2020-10-30

6.  Adequacy of the endometrial samples obtained by the uterine explora device and conventional dilatation and curettage: a comparative study.

Authors:  Maria Abdulrahim Arafah; Ammar Cherkess Al-Rikabi; Rakia Aljasser; Yaser Adi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.