Literature DB >> 19232016

Efficacy and tolerability of latanoprost compared to dorzolamide combined with timolol in the treatment of patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Jin-Wei Cheng1, Gui-Lin Xi, Rui-Li Wei, Ji-Ping Cai, You Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of latanoprost, compared with the combination of dorzolamide and timolol, in the treatment of patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).
METHODS: Pertinent randomized, controlled trials were identified through systematic searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedicine Database, and internet searches of meeting abstracts and the manufacturers' databases. The main efficacy measures were the IOP reduction (IOPR), including diurnal mean IOPR, and 10:00 IOPR. The main tolerability measure was withdrawal due to adverse events and individual adverse events.
RESULTS: Fourteen (14) studies involving 2149 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Latanoprost was significantly more effective in lowering diurnal mean IOP than combined dorzolamide and timolol in patients with IOP insufficiently controlled by timolol alone, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) for the diurnal mean IOPR% of 3.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-5.78) at 3 months, and latanoprost was as effective as the combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients without baseline timolol treatment. The combination of dorzolamide and timolol was associated with numerically greater reductions in 10:00 IOP, compared with latanoprost in patients with or without timolol treatment at baseline: only the result in patients with baseline timolol treatment at 1 month was statistically significant (WMD -4.14: range, -5.78 to -2.50). The combination of dorzolamide and timolol was less tolerated than latanoprost, with pooled relative risk for withdrawals due to adverse events being 0.34 (range, 0.13-0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost was associated with significantly greater efficacy in lowering diurnal mean IOP than combined dorzolamide and timolol in patients with IOP insufficiently controlled by timolol alone, and latanoprost was as effective as combined dorzolamide and timolol in patients without baseline timolol treatment. The combination of dorzolamide and timolol was less tolerated than latanoprost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232016     DOI: 10.1089/jop.2008.0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 1080-7683            Impact factor:   2.671


  4 in total

1.  What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; S Swaroop Vedula; Roberta Scherer; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Citation of previous meta-analyses on the same topic: a clue to perpetuation of incorrect methods?

Authors:  Tianjing Li; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Anne J Lee; Peter McCluskey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-30

Review 4.  Latanoprost in the treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  Albert Alm
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.