Literature DB >> 19231895

Comparison of the suitability of different hydrolytic strategies to predict aroma potential of different grape varieties.

Natalia Loscos1, Purificación Hernández-Orte, Juan Cacho, Vicente Ferreira.   

Abstract

Precursor extracts obtained from different grape varieties were submitted to harsh acid hydrolysis (pH 2.5, 100 degrees C, 1 h) and enzymatic hydrolysis (AR2000, pH 5, 40 degrees C, 16 h) and were also added to a synthetic must (200 g L(-1) glucose), which was fermented (yeast strain Stellevin NT 116), to compare the "natural hydrolysis" carried by yeast with alternative "fast" hydrolytic strategies. In all cases, released volatile compounds were extracted by SPE and determined by GC-MS. Leaving aside Muscat, differences between varieties were not relevant, although Grenache and Chardonnay presented some key peculiarities. In general, alcoholic fermentation showed the lowest potential to release volatile compounds from aromatic precursors, whereas enzymatic hydrolysis was the most efficient but also the most different. Practically, this implies that the predictive ability of this hydrolytic strategy is rather poor. In contrast, harsh acid hydrolysis can be considered to much more adequately measure the aroma potential of grapes for winemaking, which suggests that transformations taking place during fermentation include relevant chemical rearrangements in acid media that are better predicted by acid hydrolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19231895     DOI: 10.1021/jf803256e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  7 in total

1.  Cultivar, site or harvest date: the gordian knot of wine terroir.

Authors:  L M Schmidtke; G Antalick; K Šuklje; J W Blackman; J Boccard; A Deloire
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 2.  The Occurrence of Glycosylated Aroma Precursors in Vitis vinifera Fruit and Humulus lupulus Hop Cones and Their Roles in Wine and Beer Volatile Aroma Production.

Authors:  Andrew Caffrey; Susan E Ebeler
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-24

3.  Effect of Thidiazuron on Terpene Volatile Constituents and Terpenoid Biosynthesis Pathway Gene Expression of Shine Muscat (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera) Grape Berries.

Authors:  Wu Wang; Muhammad Khalil-Ur-Rehman; Ling-Ling Wei; Niels J Nieuwenhuizen; Huan Zheng; Jian-Min Tao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  The Actual and Potential Aroma of Winemaking Grapes.

Authors:  Vicente Ferreira; Ricardo Lopez
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-03

5.  Analysis of Intact Glycosidic Aroma Precursors in Grapes by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with a Diode Array Detector.

Authors:  Cristina Cebrián-Tarancón; José Oliva; Miguel Ángel Cámara; Gonzalo L Alonso; M Rosario Salinas
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-19

6.  Optimization of SPME-Arrow-GC/MS Method for Determination of Free and Bound Volatile Organic Compounds from Grape Skins.

Authors:  Iva Šikuten; Petra Štambuk; Jasminka Karoglan Kontić; Edi Maletić; Ivana Tomaz; Darko Preiner
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Comparative Analysis of Glycosidic Aroma Compound Profiling in Three Vitis vinifera Varieties by Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Zhuo Chen; Xin-Ke Zhang; Chang-Qing Duan; Qiu-Hong Pan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.