Literature DB >> 19231641

A randomized, double-blind comparison of the total dose of 1.0% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine required for effective local anesthesia during Mohs micrographic surgery for skin cancers.

Pamela A Morganroth1, Joel M Gelfand, Anokhi Jambusaria, David J Margolis, Christopher J Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare total lidocaine dose and patient comfort when using 1.0% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine during Mohs micrographic surgery.
METHODS: In all, 149 patients were randomized to receive 1.0% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine during Mohs micrographic surgery. The total dose of lidocaine and measures of patient comfort were recorded.
RESULTS: Compared with the 1.0% lidocaine group, there was a 52% reduction in lidocaine dose in the 0.5% group (mean difference, 147.85 mg; 95% confidence interval, 108.15-187.55; P < .001). Patient comfort was equivalent in both groups, as evidenced by the similar mean visual analog scale scores (P = .48) and mean volumes of rescue lidocaine administered (P = .18). LIMITATIONS: No lidocaine blood levels were measured, and one Mohs surgeon performed all surgeries.
CONCLUSION: The dose of 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine provides pain control equivalent to 1.0% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at approximately half the total lidocaine dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19231641     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  1 in total

1.  [Wide awake hand surgery based on application examples].

Authors:  P Kaiser; M Keller; J Dörler; G Schmidle
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 1.154

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.