Literature DB >> 19231543

10-year outcome of children born with anorectal malformation, treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, assessed according to the Krickenbeck classification.

Sinead Hassett1, Stella Snell, Amy Hughes-Thomas, Keith Holmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anorectal malformations (ARMs) affect 1 in 4000 to 5000 births. The Krickenbeck conference developed a classification based on anatomical and functional criteria to better compare treatment outcome. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome in patients 10 years following standardized surgical treatment of ARM related to the Krickenbeck classification. .
METHODS: Anatomical anomalies were classified as above. Children and carers were followed closely in a multidisciplinary clinic. Data were collected using a functional outcome questionnaire for a minimum of 10 years after surgical reconstruction. Outcome measurements were related to the Krickenbeck classification.
RESULTS: There were 53 children in the study group (29 male, 24 female). Krickenbeck anatomy: perineal fistula, 36%; vestibular fistula, 26%; rectourethral fistula, 36%; rectovesical fistula, 2%. All children were treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. In children with perineal fistula, continence was achieved in 90%. Grade 2 constipation was noted in 21%. One child had a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure. In children with vestibular fistula, continence was achieved in 57%. Grade 3 constipation was noted in 28%. One child had grade 1, and one child had grade 2 soiling. Two children had a MACE procedure. In children with rectourethral fistula, continence was achieved in 58%. One child had grade 3 soiling. Grade 3 constipation was found in 42% of children and grade 2 constipation in 1 child. A MACE procedure was performed in 36%. The only child with a bladder neck fistula had a MACE procedure for intractable soiling.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome for patients with ARM is related to the severity of the anomaly. The uniform application of the Krickenbeck classification should allow rational comparison of treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19231543     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  9 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of recto-bladderneck and recto-prostatic anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna C Shawyer; Michael H Livingston; Deborah J Cook; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Unexpected results of a nationwide, treatment-independent assessment of fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal anomalies.

Authors:  Eberhard Schmiedeke; Nadine Zwink; Nicole Schwarzer; Enrika Bartels; Dominik Schmidt; Sabine Grasshoff-Derr; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Stuart Hosie; Karsten Jablonka; Stefanie Maerzheuser; Heiko Reutter; Christian Lorenz; Ekkehart Jenetzky
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Meconium is not enough: look for the hole!

Authors:  Basher Aldeiri; Navroop Singh Johal; Paolo De Coppi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-12-18

4.  Disease-specific quality of life in children and adults with anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Caterina Grano; Dalia Aminoff; Fabio Lucidi; Cristiano Violani
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Appendicostomy in preschool children with anorectal malformation: successful early bowel management with a high frequency of minor complications.

Authors:  Pernilla Stenström; Christina Granéli; Martin Salö; Kristine Hagelsteen; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Single-stage surgical correction of anorectal malformation associated with rectourinary fistula in male neonates.

Authors:  Ernesto Leva; Francesco Macchini; Rossella Arnoldi; Antonio Di Cesare; Valerio Gentilino; Monica Fumagalli; Fabio Mosca; Akbar Bhuiyan; Maurizio Torricelli; Tahmina Banu
Journal:  J Neonatal Surg       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 7.  Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yijiang Han; Zhaobo Xia; Shikun Guo; Xiangbo Yu; Zhongrong Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Functional assessment of the patients with perineal and vestibular fistula treated by anterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

Authors:  Naoki Hashizume; Kimio Asagiri; Suguru Fukahori; Shinji Ishii; Nobuyuki Saikusa; Naruki Higashidate; Motomu Yoshida; Daisuke Masui; Saki Sakamoto; Shiori Tsuruhisa; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Minoru Yagi
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

9.  Dyssynergic patterns of defecation in constipated adolescents and young adults with anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer; Peter Christensen; Gunnar Baatrup; Marianne Skytte Jakobsen; Jon Asmussen; Niels Qvist
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.