Literature DB >> 19231479

The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect.

Guido Gainotti1, Lara De Luca, Francesca Figliozzi, Fabrizio Doricchi.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of visual distracters, stimulus duration and the presence of contralesional hemianopia on direction of the first saccade in right brain damaged (RBD) patients affected by left unilateral neglect (UN). During a visual search task we recorded eye movements in five RBD patients with UN and hemianopia (N+H+), nine RBD patients with UN but no hemianopia (N+H-), four RBD patients with neither neglect nor hemianopia and four normal controls. Two task variables were orthogonally manipulated: (a) presence or absence of distracters and (b) short or long stimulus duration. A significant interaction was found between groups, presence of distracters, stimulus duration and the direction of the first saccade made in the search. Independently of the temporal duration of targets, in N+H+ patients the presence of distracters enhanced the frequency of saccades directed ipsilesionally (i.e., rightward). In N+H- patients, distracters biased the first saccade toward the right side only at short stimulus duration. These data show that bias of attentional orienting toward stimuli in the right half of space is specific of UN. This pathological mechanism (a) is enhanced and prolonged, over the period of exploration, by concomitant complete contralateral hemianopia and (b) is most evident, even in the absence of concomitant visual field defects, when voluntary planning of attention and eye movements are precluded by the short duration of stimuli to be inspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19231479     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  7 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping operates independently of attentional selection: evidence from hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Ruth Kimchi; Maxim Hammer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Do supine position and deprivation of visual environment influence spatial neglect?

Authors:  Sahawanatou Gassama; Antoine Deplancke; Arnaud Saj; Jacques Honoré; Marc Rousseaux
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).

Authors:  Stefano Lasaponara; Mario Pinto; Marilena Aiello; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Fabrizio Doricchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Investigating the Characteristics of Covert Unilateral Spatial Neglect Using the Modified Posner Task: A Single-subject Design Study.

Authors:  Shinpei Osaki; Kazu Amimoto; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Junpei Tanabe; Nao Yoshihiro
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-03-06

6.  Virtual Reality and Eye-Tracking Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Systematic Review and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Alexander Pilgaard Kaiser; Kristian Westergaard Villadsen; Afshin Samani; Hendrik Knoche; Lars Evald
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 7.  Is There a Causal Link between the Left Lateralization of Language and Other Brain Asymmetries? A Review of Data Gathered in Patients with Focal Brain Lesions.

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.