Literature DB >> 19231379

Minimal access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extracorporeal circulatory system.

Alaadin Yilmaz1, Atiq Rehman, Uday Sonker, Geoffrey T L Kloppenburg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimal access aortic valve replacement (mAVR) has been demonstrated to be beneficial over standard median sternotomy. Similarly, minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) has been shown to have less deleterious effects than conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. We report a previously undescribed technique for AVR in combination with MECC by minimal access.
METHODS: We prospectively collected data including one-month postoperative follow-up of the first 50 patients who underwent mAVR utilizing MECC. A temporary Cordis Ventricor (Cordis Corp, Miami, FL) ventricular pacemaker and external defibrillation pads were placed at induction. A J-shaped partial upper sternotomy ending in the third intercostal space was performed. Cannulation was performed in the groin using the Seldinger technique. A vent was introduced directly in the pulmonary artery. Warm blood cardioplegia and carbon dioxide field flooding were used.
RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients (24 male) with a mean age of 68 (range, 34 to 89) were operated between May and December 2007. Operating time was 147 +/- 20 minutes, cross-clamp time was 64 +/- 10 minutes, and perfusion time was 84 +/- 17 minutes. There were no conversions to median sternotomy. Only one peroperative blood transfusion was required and postoperative blood loss was 372 +/- 170 cc. Intensive care unit stay was uneventful (average stay 2 days, range 1 to 8). One patient required a permanent pacemaker and other complications included pneumothorax, superficial wound infection, a late transient postoperative neurologic deficit, and excessive postoperative blood loss requiring mediastinal reexploration. Renal failure and major cerebral accidents did not occur. There was a 100% survival at one-month follow-up.
CONCLUSION: We have shown that minimal access aortic valve replacement using minimal extracorporeal circulation is feasible and provides excellent clinical and cosmetic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19231379     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Aortic valve replacement through J-shaped partial upper sternotomy.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Umberto Benedetto; Mohamed Amrani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Predicting 30-day mortality of aortic valve replacement by the AVR score.

Authors:  B M Swinkels; F E E Vermeulen; J C Kelder; W J van Boven; H W M Plokker; J M Ten Berg
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 3.  Cardioplegic strategies to protect the hypertrophic heart during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M-S Suleiman; M Hancock; R Shukla; C Rajakaruna; G D Angelini
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  90-Day Patient-Centered Outcomes after Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jade Claessens; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Toon Mostien; Silke Van Genechten; Marithé Claes; Loren Packlé; Maud Pierson; Jeroen Vandenbrande; Abdullah Kaya; Björn Stessel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Manubrium-limited ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement (MAVRIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Enoch Akowuah; Andrew T Goodwin; W Andrew Owens; Helen C Hancock; Rebecca Maier; Adetayo Kasim; Adrian Mellor; Khalid Khan; Gavin Murphy; James Mason
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.