Literature DB >> 19231164

Overview of the ability of different treatment methods for liquid and solid manure to inactivate pathogens.

W Martens1, R Böhm.   

Abstract

The use of manure as a fertilizer in agriculture includes the risk of spreading pathogenic infectious agents to the environment, to animals and humans. The treatment of manure can help avoid or reduce these risks. Even if the treatment is dominated by economic considerations such as biogas production, ammonia stripping or phosphorous precipitation, the hygienic aspect should be kept in mind. Otherwise, new infection chains may be established by the use of insufficiently treated manure by-products such as fertilizers still containing infective pathogens. Treatment plants should use a concept according to HACCP principles that includes hazard analysis, risk assessment, the determination of process relevant CCPs and the validation of the process by determining the hygienizing efficiency using representative test organisms as well as microbial end product supervision. Treatment methods can be divided into physical, chemical and microbiological treatment, sometimes used in combination. For economical reasons, only composting or anaerobic treatment (biogas) or, to a minor extent, aerobic thermophilic stabilization (ATS) are used as routine preventive measures on a farm level. In cases of outbreaks of notifiable diseases both physical and chemical treatment of manure can lead to reliable disinfected/pasteurised end products which can be used in agriculture without long-lasting risks for soil fertility or the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19231164     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  5 in total

1.  Ammonia disinfection of hatchery waste for elimination of single-stranded RNA viruses.

Authors:  Eva Emmoth; Jakob Ottoson; Ann Albihn; Sándor Belák; Björn Vinnerås
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Repurposing anaerobic digestate for economical biomanufacturing and water recovery.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Roy Posmanik; Sabrina Spatari; Victor C Ujor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Stockpiling versus Composting: Effectiveness in Reducing Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Resistance Genes in Beef Cattle Manure.

Authors:  Zachery R Staley; Bryan L Woodbury; Bobbi S Stromer; Amy M Schmidt; Daniel D Snow; Shannon L Bartelt-Hunt; Bing Wang; Xu Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Using agro-industrial wastes for the cultivation of microalgae and duckweeds: Contamination risks and biomass safety concerns.

Authors:  Giorgos Markou; Liang Wang; Jianfeng Ye; Adrian Unc
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 14.227

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.