Denise H M Bodden1, Susan M Bögels, Peter Muris. 1. Research Centre of Psychosocial Development in Context, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80.140, Utrecht 3508 TC, The Netherlands. d.bodden@uu.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic utility of the 71-item Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-71), as a screening tool for identifying anxiety disorders in youth aged 8-18 years. METHOD: The SCARED-71 and the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS) were administered to clinically referred anxious children (n=138) and control children (n=38) as well as their parents. RESULTS: Results showed that the SCARED-71 differentiated clinically anxious from control children on the total score and on all subscales. Girls generally reported higher levels of anxiety symptoms and there were also significant age effects for various anxiety subscales. Further, reliable cut-off scores were established for the child and parent version of the SCARED-71. The parent version displayed better sensitivity and specificity, and therefore seems to be a more optimal screen for anxiety problems in children and adolescents. Finally, evidence for the predictive validity across anxiety disorders was found. CONCLUSION: The SCARED-71 can be used as a screening tool to detect clinically significant anxiety problems in children and adolescents and discriminates reasonably well among specific anxiety disorders.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the diagnostic utility of the 71-item Screen for ChildAnxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-71), as a screening tool for identifying anxiety disorders in youth aged 8-18 years. METHOD: The SCARED-71 and the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS) were administered to clinically referred anxious children (n=138) and control children (n=38) as well as their parents. RESULTS: Results showed that the SCARED-71 differentiated clinically anxious from control children on the total score and on all subscales. Girls generally reported higher levels of anxiety symptoms and there were also significant age effects for various anxiety subscales. Further, reliable cut-off scores were established for the child and parent version of the SCARED-71. The parent version displayed better sensitivity and specificity, and therefore seems to be a more optimal screen for anxiety problems in children and adolescents. Finally, evidence for the predictive validity across anxiety disorders was found. CONCLUSION: The SCARED-71 can be used as a screening tool to detect clinically significant anxiety problems in children and adolescents and discriminates reasonably well among specific anxiety disorders.
Authors: Mélou Jansen; Marleen M E M van Doorn; Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff; Rowella C W M Kuijpers; Huub Theunissen; Mirjam Korte; José van Rossum; Annemiek Wauben; Isabela Granic Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Luuk Stapersma; Gertrude van den Brink; Jan van der Ende; Eva M Szigethy; Ruud Beukers; Thea A Korpershoek; Sabine D M Theuns-Valks; Manon H J Hillegers; Johanna C Escher; Elisabeth M W J Utens Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2018-10-01
Authors: Connor Morrow Kerns; Brenna B Maddox; Philip C Kendall; Keiran Rump; Leandra Berry; Robert T Schultz; Margaret C Souders; Amanda Bennett; John Herrington; Judith Miller Journal: Autism Date: 2015-01-29
Authors: Tara S Peris; Michelle S Rozenman; Catherine A Sugar; James T McCracken; John Piacentini Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 8.829