Literature DB >> 19230026

The prognostic value of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the follow-up of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer after intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy.

Spasenija Savic1, Inti Zlobec, George N Thalmann, Daniel Engeler, Martina Schmauss, Kurt Lehmann, Gianfranco Mattarelli, Tobias Eichenberger, Peter Dalquen, Peter Spieler, René Schoenegg, Thomas C Gasser, Tullio Sulser, Thomas Forster, Tobias Zellweger, Roberto Casella, Lukas Bubendorf.   

Abstract

Molecular markers reliably predicting failure or success of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in the treatment of nonmuscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (NMIBC) are lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the value of cytology and chromosomal aberrations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in predicting failure to BCG therapy. Sixty-eight patients with NMIBC were prospectively recruited. Bladder washings collected before and after BCG instillation were analyzed by conventional cytology and by multitarget FISH assay (UroVysion, Abbott/Vysis, Des Plaines, IL) for aberrations of chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and 9p21. Persistent and recurrent bladder cancers were defined as positive events during follow-up. Twenty-six of 68 (38%) NMIBC failed to BCG. Both positive post-BCG cytology and positive post-BCG FISH were significantly associated with failure of BCG (hazard ratio (HR)= 5.1 and HR= 5.6, respectively; p < 0.001 each) when compared to those with negative results. In the subgroup of nondefinitive cytology (all except those with unequivocally positive cytology), FISH was superior to cytology as a marker of relapse (HR= 6.2 and 1.4, respectively). Cytology and FISH in post-BCG bladder washings are highly interrelated and a positive result predicts failure to BCG therapy in patients with NMIBC equally well. FISH is most useful in the diagnostically less certain cytology categories but does not provide additional information in clearly malignant cytology. Copyright 2008 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19230026     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Reflex fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for suspicious urinary cytology in patients with bladder cancer with negative surveillance cystoscopy.

Authors:  Philip H Kim; Ranjit Sukhu; Billy H Cordon; John P Sfakianos; Daniel D Sjoberg; A Ari Hakimi; Guido Dalbagni; Oscar Lin; Harry W Herr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Evaluation of urovysion and cytology for bladder cancer detection: a study of 1835 paired urine samples with clinical and histologic correlation.

Authors:  Haythem Dimashkieh; Daynna J Wolff; T Michael Smith; Patricia M Houser; Paul J Nietert; Jack Yang
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Impact of intravesical therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer on the accuracy of urine cytology.

Authors:  Mohit Gupta; Niv Milbar; Giorgia Tema; Filippo Pederzoli; Meera Chappidi; Max Kates; Christopher J VandenBussche; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Influence of age on false positive rates of urine-based tumor markers.

Authors:  M Horstmann; T Todenhöfer; J Hennenlotter; S Aufderklamm; J Mischinger; U Kuehs; G Gakis; A Stenzl; C Schwentner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to predict response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective trial.

Authors:  Ashish M Kamat; Rian J Dickstein; Fabrizio Messetti; Roosevelt Anderson; Shanna M Pretzsch; Graciela Noguera Gonzalez; Ruth L Katz; Abha Khanna; Tanweer Zaidi; Xifeng Wu; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Biomarkers for precision medicine in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Kojima; Koji Kawai; Jun Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: are we there yet?

Authors:  George J Netto
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Emerging critical role of molecular testing in diagnostic genitourinary pathology.

Authors:  George J Netto; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.