BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls are a major health problem in the elderly community; however, questions regarding incidence, risk factors, and provider response to falls exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of falls, associated factors, health care costs, and provider response to falls among Medicare beneficiaries. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 12,669 respondents to the Medicare Current Beneficiaries Survey (MCBS). METHODS: Categories of number of falls (none, one, recurrent) and injury type (medically injurious versus not medically injurious) were created from the falls supplement to the MCBS. Means and proportions for the entire Medicare population were estimated using sampling weights. The association between sociodemographic variables and fall status was modeled using ordinal or binary logistic regression. Aggregate health costs by fall category were estimated from claims data. RESULTS: Population estimates of falls reported in 2002 ranged from 3.7 million (single fall) to 3.1 million (recurrent falls), with an estimated 2.2 million people having a medically injurious fall. Recurrent falls were more likely with increased age, being female, being nonwhite, reporting fair or poor health, and increased number of limitations in personal activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living and comorbidities. Although estimates of the actual costs of falls could not be determined, "fallers" consistently had larger utilization costs than "nonfallers" for the year 2002. Fewer than half (48%) of the beneficiaries reported talking to a health care provider following a fall, and 60% of those beneficiaries reported receiving fall prevention information. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Falls are common and may be associated with significant health care costs. Most importantly, health care providers may be missing many opportunities to provide fall prevention information to older people.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls are a major health problem in the elderly community; however, questions regarding incidence, risk factors, and provider response to falls exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of falls, associated factors, health care costs, and provider response to falls among Medicare beneficiaries. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 12,669 respondents to the Medicare Current Beneficiaries Survey (MCBS). METHODS: Categories of number of falls (none, one, recurrent) and injury type (medically injurious versus not medically injurious) were created from the falls supplement to the MCBS. Means and proportions for the entire Medicare population were estimated using sampling weights. The association between sociodemographic variables and fall status was modeled using ordinal or binary logistic regression. Aggregate health costs by fall category were estimated from claims data. RESULTS: Population estimates of falls reported in 2002 ranged from 3.7 million (single fall) to 3.1 million (recurrent falls), with an estimated 2.2 million people having a medically injurious fall. Recurrent falls were more likely with increased age, being female, being nonwhite, reporting fair or poor health, and increased number of limitations in personal activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living and comorbidities. Although estimates of the actual costs of falls could not be determined, "fallers" consistently had larger utilization costs than "nonfallers" for the year 2002. Fewer than half (48%) of the beneficiaries reported talking to a health care provider following a fall, and 60% of those beneficiaries reported receiving fall prevention information. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Falls are common and may be associated with significant health care costs. Most importantly, health care providers may be missing many opportunities to provide fall prevention information to older people.
Authors: John T Chang; Sally C Morton; Laurence Z Rubenstein; Walter A Mojica; Margaret Maglione; Marika J Suttorp; Elizabeth A Roth; Paul G Shekelle Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-03-20
Authors: Meg Morris; Deborah Osborne; Keith Hill; Hal Kendig; Birgitta Lundgren-Lindquist; Colette Browning; Jane Reid Journal: Aust J Physiother Date: 2004
Authors: R W Sattin; D A Lambert Huber; C A DeVito; J G Rodriguez; A Ros; S Bacchelli; J A Stevens; R J Waxweiler Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Richard H Fortinsky; Michele Iannuzzi-Sucich; Dorothy I Baker; Margaret Gottschalk; Mary B King; Cynthia J Brown; Mary E Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Laurence Z Rubenstein; David H Solomon; Carol P Roth; Roy T Young; Paul G Shekelle; John T Chang; Catherine H MacLean; Caren J Kamberg; Debra Saliba; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tammy T Hshieh; Jirong Yue; Esther Oh; Margaret Puelle; Sarah Dowal; Thomas Travison; Sharon K Inouye Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: M Gietzelt; J Spehr; Y Ehmen; S Wegel; F Feldwieser; M Meis; M Marschollek; K-H Wolf; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; M Gövercin Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: Marna R Greenberg; Bryan G Kane; Vicken Y Totten; Neha P Raukar; Elizabeth C Moore; Tracy Sanson; Robert D Barraco; Michael C Nguyen; Federico E Vaca Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.451