PURPOSE: Single-agent chemotherapy is largely the treatment of choice for systemic therapy of metastatic melanoma, but survival rates are low, and novel adjuvant and systemic therapies are urgently required. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a potential therapeutic target, and two relatively new drugs, fenretinide and bortezomib (Velcade), each acting via different cellular mechanisms, induce ER stress leading to apoptosis in melanoma cells. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that apoptosis of melanoma cells may be increased by combining clinically achievable concentrations of fenretinide and bortezomib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three human melanoma cell lines were used to assess changes in viability and the induction of apoptosis in response to fenretinide, bortezomib, or both drugs together. A s.c. xenograft model was used to test responses in vivo. RESULTS: Fenretinide and bortezomib synergistically decreased viability and increased apoptosis in all three melanoma lines at clinically achievable concentrations. This was also reflected by increased expression of GADD153, a marker of ER stress-induced apoptosis. In vivo, fenretinide in combination with bortezomib gave a marked reduction in xenograft tumor volume and an increase in apoptosis compared with fenretinide or bortezomib alone. The cell cycle stage of tumor cells in vivo were similar to that predicted from the effects of each drug or the combination in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fenretinide and bortezomib, both of which are available in clinical formulation, warrant clinical evaluation as a combination therapy for metastatic melanoma.
PURPOSE: Single-agent chemotherapy is largely the treatment of choice for systemic therapy of metastatic melanoma, but survival rates are low, and novel adjuvant and systemic therapies are urgently required. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a potential therapeutic target, and two relatively new drugs, fenretinide and bortezomib (Velcade), each acting via different cellular mechanisms, induce ER stress leading to apoptosis in melanoma cells. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that apoptosis of melanoma cells may be increased by combining clinically achievable concentrations of fenretinide and bortezomib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three humanmelanoma cell lines were used to assess changes in viability and the induction of apoptosis in response to fenretinide, bortezomib, or both drugs together. A s.c. xenograft model was used to test responses in vivo. RESULTS:Fenretinide and bortezomib synergistically decreased viability and increased apoptosis in all three melanoma lines at clinically achievable concentrations. This was also reflected by increased expression of GADD153, a marker of ER stress-induced apoptosis. In vivo, fenretinide in combination with bortezomib gave a marked reduction in xenograft tumor volume and an increase in apoptosis compared with fenretinide or bortezomib alone. The cell cycle stage of tumor cells in vivo were similar to that predicted from the effects of each drug or the combination in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fenretinide and bortezomib, both of which are available in clinical formulation, warrant clinical evaluation as a combination therapy for metastatic melanoma.
Authors: K E Tagscherer; A Fassl; B Campos; M Farhadi; A Kraemer; B C Böck; S Macher-Goeppinger; B Radlwimmer; O D Wiestler; C Herold-Mende; W Roth Journal: Oncogene Date: 2008-07-28 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Franca Formelli; Elena Cavadini; Roberto Luksch; Alberto Garaventa; Maria Grazia Villani; Valentina Appierto; Stefano Persiani Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2007-12-08 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Penny E Lovat; Marco Corazzari; Jane L Armstrong; Shaun Martin; Vittoria Pagliarini; David Hill; Anna M Brown; Mauro Piacentini; Mark A Birch-Machin; Christopher P F Redfern Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Shaun Martin; David S Hill; James C Paton; Adrienne W Paton; Mark A Birch-Machin; Penny E Lovat; Chris P F Redfern Journal: Pigment Cell Melanoma Res Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Jane L Armstrong; Ross Flockhart; Gareth J Veal; Penny E Lovat; Christopher P F Redfern Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Belamy B Cheung; Owen Tan; Jessica Koach; Bing Liu; Michael S Y Shum; Daniel R Carter; Selina Sutton; Sela T Po'uha; Louis Chesler; Michelle Haber; Murray D Norris; Maria Kavallaris; Tao Liu; Geraldine M O'Neill; Glenn M Marshall Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Andrew J Cowan; Shani L Frayo; Oliver W Press; Maria C Palanca-Wessels; John M Pagel; Damian J Green; Ajay K Gopal Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Yan Cheng; Xingcong Ren; Yi Zhang; Yu Shan; Kathryn J Huber-Keener; Li Zhang; Scot R Kimball; Harold Harvey; Leonard S Jefferson; Jin-Ming Yang Journal: Autophagy Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 16.016