Literature DB >> 19228647

Laboratory medicine quality indicators: a review of the literature.

Shahram Shahangian1, Susan R Snyder.   

Abstract

We summarize information on quality indicators related to laboratory testing from published literature and Internet sources to assess current gaps with respect to stages of the laboratory testing process, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) health care domains, and quality measure evaluation criteria. Our search strategy used various general and specific terms for clinical conditions and laboratory procedures. References related to a potential quality indicator associated with laboratory testing and an IOM health care domain were included. With the exception of disease- and condition-related indicators originating from clinical guidelines, the laboratory medicine quality indicators reviewed did not satisfy minimum standard evaluation criteria for quality or performance measures (ie, importance, scientific acceptability, and feasibility) and demonstrated a need across the total laboratory testing process for consistently specified, useful, and evidence-based, laboratory-related quality and performance measures that are important to health outcomes and meaningful to health care stakeholders for which laboratories can be held accountable.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19228647     DOI: 10.1309/AJCPJF8JI4ZLDQUE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  22 in total

1.  Knowledge and perceptions of quality systems among Vermont laboratorians.

Authors:  Steven R Blumen; Phda Shelly Naud; Mary Val Palumbo; Barbara McIntosh; Burton W Wilcke
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing.

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 3.  Implementation of Rapid Molecular Infectious Disease Diagnostics: the Role of Diagnostic and Antimicrobial Stewardship.

Authors:  Kevin Messacar; Sarah K Parker; James K Todd; Samuel R Dominguez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process.

Authors:  Robert Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  The "EPiQ"-Study (Evaluation of preanalytical quality): S-Monovette® in manual aspiration mode drastically reduces hemolytic samples in head-to-head study.

Authors:  Laura Millius; Erwin Riedo; Thierry Caron; Juliette Belissent; Benoît Fellay; Vincent Ribordy; Jean-Luc Magnin
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-07-28

6.  Development of a Novel Quality Improvement Indicator Based on the Hemolysis Index.

Authors:  Eun Jin Lee; Miyoung Kim; Han Sung Kim; Min Jeong Park; Young Kyung Lee; Hee Jung Kang
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Recommendations for lab-based screening tests for adult women.

Authors:  Shahram Shahangian
Journal:  Adv Adm Lab       Date:  2014-08-04

Review 8.  Bringing the clinical laboratory into the strategy to advance diagnostic excellence.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; J Rex Astles; Shahram Shahangian; Bereneice Madison; Ritchard Parry; Robert L Schmidt; Matthew L Rubinstein
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-06

9.  Practices and Perceived Value of Proficiency Testing in Clinical Laboratories.

Authors:  Marie C Earley; J Rex Astles; Karen Breckenridge
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 10.  Harmonization of pre-analytical quality indicators.

Authors:  Mario Plebani; Laura Sciacovelli; Ada Aita; Maria Laura Chiozza
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.