Literature DB >> 19228574

Canadian National Dose Registry of radiation workers: overview of research from 1951 through 2007.

Jan M Zielinski1, Natalia S Shilnikova, Daniel Krewski.   

Abstract

The National Dose Registry (NDR) of Canada is a unique resource for a direct estimation of the potential health risks associated with low doses of ionizing radiation. This is the largest national occupational radiation exposure database, comprising records for about 600,000 nuclear, industrial, medical and dental workers. An analysis of the NDR data based on a cohort of about 200,000 workers first exposed before 1984 and followed through 1987 and 1988 for mortality and cancer incidence, respectively, revealed that the mortality from most causes of death considered was lower than that in the general population, which is typical of occupational cohorts. Although the same was also observed for cancer incidence, there was a significant increase in the incidence of thyroid cancer and melanoma which, however, was not clearly related to radiation exposure. A significant dose-response was found for mortality from all causes, all cancers, lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, accidents, for incidence of all cancers, cancers of the rectum and lung, leukaemia, all cancers except lung, and all cancers except leukaemia. In addition, in male workers, a significant dose-response was found for the incidence of colon, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. The estimates of cancer risks (mortality and incidence) were higher than those in most other occupational cohorts and in the studies on atomic bomb survivors. The biologically based dose-response models used to describe lung cancer incidence in the NDR showed that for a protracted exposure to low radiation doses there was a significant radiation effect on the promotion and malignant conversion, but not on the initiation stage of carcinogenesis. This stands in contrast to the findings for high-dose acute exposures in A-bomb survivors, where the initiation and possibly promotion were found to be affected by radiation exposure. Evidence of an inverse dose-rate effect (i.e. an increase in the risk with a protraction of a given cumulative dose) was found in the NDR cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19228574     DOI: 10.2478/v10001-008-0037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health        ISSN: 1232-1087            Impact factor:   1.843


  6 in total

Review 1.  Occupational risk factors and pancreatic cancer: a review of recent findings.

Authors:  Gabriella Andreotti; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Embryonic development and skeletogenic gene expression affected by X-rays in the Mediterranean sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus.

Authors:  Valeria Matranga; Francesca Zito; Caterina Costa; Rosa Bonaventura; Salvatore Giarrusso; Filippo Celi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Operator Radiation and the Efficacy of Ceiling-Suspended Lead Screen Shielding during Coronary Angiography: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study Using Real-Time Dosimeters.

Authors:  Qianjun Jia; Ziman Chen; Xianxian Jiang; Zhenjun Zhao; Meiping Huang; Jiahua Li; Jian Zhuang; Xiaoqing Liu; Tianyu Hu; Wensheng Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Alexander Vaiserman; Alexander Koliada; Oksana Zabuga; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Occupational Radiation Exposure and Validity of National Dosimetry Registry among Korean Interventional Radiologists.

Authors:  Seulki Ko; Kwang Pyo Kim; Sung Bum Cho; Ye Jin Bang; Yae Won Ha; Won Jin Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Risk of stomach cancer incidence in a cohort of Mayak PA workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Galina V Zhuntova; Tamara V Azizova; Evgeniya S Grigoryeva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.