Literature DB >> 19227818

The biologistical construction of race: 'admixture' technology and the new genetic medicine.

Duana Fullwiley1.   

Abstract

This paper presents an ethnographic case study of the use of race in two interconnected laboratories of medical genetics. Specifically, it examines how researchers committed to reducing health disparities in Latinos with asthma advance hypotheses and structure research to show that relative frequencies of genetic markers characterize commonly understood groupings of race. They do this first by unapologetically advancing the idea that peoples whom they take to be of the 'Old World', or 'Africans', 'Europeans', 'East Asians', and 'Native Americans', can serve as putatively pure reference populations against which genetic risk for common diseases such as asthma can be calculated for those in the 'New World'. Technologically, they deploy a tool called ancestry informative markers (AIMs), which are a collection of genetic sequence variants said to differ in present-day West Africans, East Asians, Europeans, and (ideally Pre-Columbian) Native Americans. I argue that this technology, compelling as it may be to a range of actors who span the political spectrum, is, at base, designed to bring about a correspondence of familiar ideas of race and supposed socially neutral DNA. This correspondence happens, in part, as the scientists in question often bracket the environment while privileging racialized genetic variance as the primary source of health disparities for common disease, in this case between Mexicans and Puerto Ricans with asthma. With their various collaborators, these scientists represent a growing movement within medical genetics to re-consider race and 'racial admixture' as biogenetically valid points of departure. Furthermore, many actors at the center of this ethnography focus on race as a function of their personal identity politics as scientists of color. This to say, they are driven not by racist notions of human difference, but by a commitment to reduce health disparities and to include 'their' communities in what they describe as the 'genetic revolution'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19227818     DOI: 10.1177/0306312708090796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Stud Sci        ISSN: 0306-3127            Impact factor:   3.885


  19 in total

1.  The texture of the real: experimentation and experience in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bromley
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03

2.  Attitudes on DNA ancestry tests.

Authors:  Jennifer K Wagner; Kenneth M Weiss
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Homogeneity and heterogeneity as situational properties: producing--and moving beyond?--race in post-genomic science.

Authors:  Janet K Shim; Katherine Weatherford Darling; Martine D Lappe; L Katherine Thomson; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Robert A Hiatt; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 4.  Social diversity in humans: implications and hidden consequences for biological research.

Authors:  Troy Duster
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Different differences: the use of 'genetic ancestry' versus race in biomedical human genetic research.

Authors:  Joan H Fujimura; Ramya Rajagopalan
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.885

6.  Race and ancestry in the age of inclusion: technique and meaning in post-genomic science.

Authors:  Janet K Shim; Sara L Ackerman; Katherine Weatherford Darling; Robert A Hiatt; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2014-11-06

7.  What are our AIMs? Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Use of Ancestry Estimation in Disease Research.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Janelle S Taylor; Karen L Edwards; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012

8.  Barriers and Strategies Related to Qualitative Research on Genetic Ancestry Testing in Indigenous Communities.

Authors:  Jessica W Blanchard; Gloria Tallbull; Chantelle Wolpert; Jill Powell; Morris W Foster; Charmaine Royal
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 9.  Looking for race in all the wrong places: analyzing the lack of productivity in the ongoing debate about race and genetics.

Authors:  Morris W Foster
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Knowing something versus feeling different:The effects and non-effects of genetic ancestry on racial identity.

Authors:  Janet K Shim; Sonia Rab Alam; Bradley E Aouizerat
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2018-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.