Literature DB >> 19226657

Co-expression among constituents of a motif in the protein-protein interaction network.

Nitin Bhardwaj1, Hui Lu.   

Abstract

Almost all cellular functions are the results of well-coordinated interactions between various proteins. A more connected hub or motif in the interaction network is expected to be more important, and any perturbation in this motif would be more damaging to the smooth performance of the related functions. Thus, some coherent robustness of these hubs has to be derived. Here, we provide the global evidence that interaction hubs obtain their robustness against uneven protein concentrations through co-expression of the constituents, and that the degree of co-expression correlates strongly with the complexity of the embedded motif. We calculated the gene expression correlations between the proteins embedded in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-node interaction motifs of increasing complexities, and compared them to those between proteins from random motifs of similar complexities. We find that as the connectedness of these motifs increases, there is higher co-expression between the constituent proteins. For example, when the expression correlation is 0.7, the kernel density of the correlation increases from 0.152 for 4-node motifs with three edges to 0.403 for 4-node cliques. This implies that the robustness of the interaction system emerges from a proportionate synchronicity among the constituents of the motif via co-expression. We further show that such biological coherence via co-expression of component proteins can be reinforced by integrating conservation data in the analysis. For example, with addition of evolutionary information from other genomes, the ratio of kernel density for interaction and random data in the case of 5- and 6-node cliques in yeast increases from 37.8 to 123 and 98.4 to 1300, respectively, given that the expression correlation is 0.8. Our results show that genes whose products are involved in motifs have transcription and translation properties that minimize the noise in final protein concentrations, compared to random sets of genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19226657      PMCID: PMC2770376          DOI: 10.1142/s0219720009003959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol        ISSN: 0219-7200            Impact factor:   1.122


  49 in total

1.  The small world of metabolism.

Authors:  D A Fell; A Wagner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Serial regulation of transcriptional regulators in the yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  I Simon; J Barnett; N Hannett; C T Harbison; N J Rinaldi; T L Volkert; J J Wyrick; J Zeitlinger; D K Gifford; T S Jaakkola; R A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-09-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.

Authors:  R Milo; S Shen-Orr; S Itzkovitz; N Kashtan; D Chklovskii; U Alon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization.

Authors:  Albert-László Barabási; Zoltán N Oltvai
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks.

Authors:  E Ravasz; A L Somera; D A Mongru; Z N Oltvai; A L Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.

Authors:  Jing-Dong J Han; Nicolas Bertin; Tong Hao; Debra S Goldberg; Gabriel F Berriz; Lan V Zhang; Denis Dupuy; Albertha J M Walhout; Michael E Cusick; Frederick P Roth; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Fields; O Song
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome.

Authors:  T Ito; T Chiba; R Ozawa; M Yoshida; M Hattori; Y Sakaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Predicting protein function from protein/protein interaction data: a probabilistic approach.

Authors:  Stanley Letovsky; Simon Kasif
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Stable evolutionary signal in a yeast protein interaction network.

Authors:  Stefan Wuchty; Albert-Laszlo Barabási; Michael T Ferdig
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  7 in total

1.  iCAVE: an open source tool for visualizing biomolecular networks in 3D, stereoscopic 3D and immersive 3D.

Authors:  Vaja Liluashvili; Selim Kalayci; Eugene Fluder; Manda Wilson; Aaron Gabow; Zeynep H Gümüs
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  Arabidopsis G-protein interactome reveals connections to cell wall carbohydrates and morphogenesis.

Authors:  Karsten Klopffleisch; Nguyen Phan; Kelsey Augustin; Robert S Bayne; Katherine S Booker; Jose R Botella; Nicholas C Carpita; Tyrell Carr; Jin-Gui Chen; Thomas Ryan Cooke; Arwen Frick-Cheng; Erin J Friedman; Brandon Fulk; Michael G Hahn; Kun Jiang; Lucia Jorda; Lydia Kruppe; Chenggang Liu; Justine Lorek; Maureen C McCann; Antonio Molina; Etsuko N Moriyama; M Shahid Mukhtar; Yashwanti Mudgil; Sivakumar Pattathil; John Schwarz; Steven Seta; Matthew Tan; Ulrike Temp; Yuri Trusov; Daisuke Urano; Bastian Welter; Jing Yang; Ralph Panstruga; Joachim F Uhrig; Alan M Jones
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 11.429

3.  Dynamic modularity of host protein interaction networks in Salmonella Typhi infection.

Authors:  Paltu Kumar Dhal; Ranjan Kumar Barman; Sudipto Saha; Santasabuj Das
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A matrix rank based concordance index for evaluating and detecting conditional specific co-expressed gene modules.

Authors:  Zhi Han; Jie Zhang; Guoyuan Sun; Gang Liu; Kun Huang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Extra Large G-Protein Interactome Reveals Multiple Stress Response Function and Partner-Dependent XLG Subcellular Localization.

Authors:  Ying Liang; Yajun Gao; Alan M Jones
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  An integrative network algorithm identifies age-associated differential methylation interactome hotspots targeting stem-cell differentiation pathways.

Authors:  James West; Stephan Beck; Xiangdong Wang; Andrew E Teschendorff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Heterodimer Binding Scaffolds Recognition via the Analysis of Kinetically Hot Residues.

Authors:  Ognjen Perišić
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.